internet gryphon. admin of Beehaw, mostly publicly interacting with people. nonbinary. they/she
some people already do this (but with oil companies). one is actually quoted in the article here:
All jokes aside, even advocates of naming extreme heat aren’t sure what the best approach should be.
“I were in charge, I think I would name them Heat Wave Exxon Mobil, Heat Wave Chevron,” said Jeff Goodell, author of the book “The Heat Will Kill You First.”
The book’s title is certainly attention-grabbing, and Goodell said that’s the point — just like putting a name on extreme heat.
here are their demands from their letter calling for voluntary recognition:
- A horizontal staffing structure across the organization
- Two union-elected staff voting members to the Board of Directors
- Collective hiring and separation process, including collective decision making around layoffs, reduction of hours, new hires, and furloughs
- Full commitment to the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement and the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel by December 2024
- Standardized pay progression and yearly Cost-Of-Living Adjustment raises
- Expanded health, commuter, paid leave benefits for all staff
- A Curatorial Committee made up of three union-elected members in addition to the Artistic & Executive Director and the Director of Programs to approve events
- Consolidated HR administered by a third party company
- Two union-elected staff representatives in both the Finance and Strategic Plan committees of the Board of Directors, ensuring budgetary allocations to Diversity, Equity, Accessibility, and Liberation work and the maintenance and upkeep of to the theater
will be interested to see how many of these they can win through collective bargaining
the IWW successfully unionized three Peet’s stores previously, and hopefully this will be their fourth; they filed for a union election on July 8 and seem to be awaiting that.
NOAA “should be dismantled and many of its functions eliminated, sent to other agencies, privatized, or placed under the control of states and territories,” Project 2025 reads. The proposals roughly amount to two main avenues of attack. First, it suggests that the NWS should eliminate its public-facing forecasts, focus on data gathering, and otherwise “fully commercialize its forecasting operations,” which the authors of the plan imply will improve, not limit, forecasts for all Americans. Then, NOAA’s scientific-research arm, which studies things such as Arctic-ice dynamics and how greenhouse gases behave (and which the document calls “the source of much of NOAA’s climate alarmism”), should be aggressively shrunk. “The preponderance of its climate-change research should be disbanded,” the document says. It further notes that scientific agencies such as NOAA are “vulnerable to obstructionism of an Administration’s aims,” so appointees should be screened to ensure that their views are “wholly in sync” with the president’s.