Oh I see you’re being pedantic about the word digital

You perhaps need to read the post again

When were billionaires literally put against the wall and shot?

“Lol,” said toad. “Lmao even”

Something like Norway’s system is ideal imo

That thread was so ew

I’ll freely own the fact that I’m a western, white, woman and can never fully understand the cultural and greater context surrounding the choice as to why a Muslim woman, or a woman of any religion, creed, race, upbringing, etc would desire to wear a piece of clothing that would to me, with my cultural and greater context, be a symbol of my oppression.

The cool part is that I don’t have to understand why she would make such a choice, to support her right to make such a choice.

If you want to support womens rights, you can’t go around trying to restrict us. If you are concerned that women who are making these choices are doing so under indoctrination, coercion, etc, then instead channel your energy into making sure they, and all women, have safe places and resources to address those things.

I don’t think its fair to put the blame on stupid people when you have the best minds of the modern age finely tuning advertising and visual effects and psychological trickery to entice people into specific, addictive, behaviours

The only reason casinos try hard to keep people out is because of laws - there are no where near the same kinds of regulations about lootboxes

Anyway - we broadly agree with eachother and I think we both made our point :P

Making the game free was part of the model of the loot boxes - people are less likely to get invested in your moneymaker if they have to pay for entry to the casino

But yes. Despite being in many ways the first iteration of what cosmetic loot boxes are nowadays, they weren’t the most predatory about it

They effectively created the modern videogame lootbox, yes. However they haven’t been caught with their pants down specifically targeting children with them, unlike Epic.

Still, fuck valve for lootboxes

Their next engine has AI baked into its very core!

Why are people still using the r-slur in 2026 sigh

Its approx a 6 inch cube

Aha makes sense

Um, what?

Reasonable

If you’re not trans you’re definitely something

The frame is a standalone headset

My interpretation was not that its about sheer volume, but a relative proportion. One might have 2x more orgasms from masturbation than from sex, but if they have sex 1/4 as often then they are “orgasming more frequently from sex than from masturbation”

However, I do imagine the vast majority of people who masturbate have a near 100% orgasm rate from masturbation.

To be clear, I’m not saying the process is the charm. I’m saying the process leads to a product that is charming, as a result of having had restrictions.

An AI that could perfectly produce what the dev desires would not lead to this innovation from constraints.

Don’t Stop Girlypop is such a vibe wym ugly

I’d imagine people care more about a cohesive visual direction than they care about “pretty”. A lot of AI art already captures what an average jane would probably consider pretty, in a shallow sense. It just isn’t cohesive and its morally bankrupt beyond that so it gives people the big ick