No you can’t. In the same way you can’t watch a Mickey mouse movie and then draw your own Mickey mouse from what you recall from the movie
Yes, I can. I can create a legally distinct mouse-bases cartoon.
You’re right that if an llm gives you copyrighted code that it would be a potential problem. But the article saying that it somehow “strips the code of any copyright” is ridiculous.
No, sometimes they spit out shit verbatim.
Then that code world still be under the oss copyright. There’s no “licence washing” going on.
Wisp turns indentation based syntax into Lisp.
Holy fuck no! 🤣
You don’t need an LLM to find and copy GPL code. The LLM isn’t adding anything new here.
Who is wholesale copying OSS code and releasing it under a non-compliant license with an LLM?
create my own code with the knowledge gained from your code
Not copy your code. Use it to learn what algorithms it uses and ideas on how to implement it.
Also - this conclusion is ridiculous:
By incorporating copyleft data into their models, the LLMs do share the work - but not alike. Instead, the AI strips the work of its provenance and transforms it to be copyright free.
That is absolutely not true. It doesn’t remove the copyright from the original work and no court has ruled as such.
If I wrote a “random code generator” that just happened to create the source code for Microsoft Windows in entirety it wouldn’t strip Microsoft of its copyright.
Yes. And this is kinda hand-wavy bullshit.
By incorporating copyleft data into their models, the LLMs do share the work - but not alike. Instead, the AI strips the work of its provenance and transforms it to be copyright free.
That’s not how it works. Your code is not “incorporated” into the model in any recognizable form. It trains a model of vectors. There isn’t a file with your for loop in there though.
I can read your code, learn from it, and create my own code with the knowledge gained from your code without violating an OSS license. So can an LLM.
If you put a fucking sign on your door saying “come on in!” then don’t be angry when people do?
Well, many Schemers love the language
Neat. Everyone else hates it. Not dislikes, not “can deal with it”. But hates it.)))))))))))))) ))))))))))))))
destroy the bargain that made free software spread like wildfire
If you didn’t want your code to be used by others then don’t make it open source.
I ran a fairly popular RTCW server back in the day… Insta-gib and sniper rifles only. Good times.
What? I’m looking for minimal setup but for desktop use (by this I mean machine which I’ll be using as my workstation), not for a server.
Which isn’t a “minimal” Linux installation. Which is fine - you don’t actually need a “minimal” system. I’m not sure you even know why you want that. Just install any Linux distro and go to town. You can remove things if you like.
“Stop trying to make ‘scheme’ happen”
Seriously though - almost nobody but language nerds like scheme.
Sounds like “minimal” just went out the door?
People seem to think that the default de is the only one you can use. Do you know that you can install gnome alongside cosmic? I run popos with kde. And cosmic to test.
You can just install it if you’re running pop os and see how it is.
They’re good at different things.
Terraform is better at “here is a configuration file - make my infrastructure look like it” and Ansible is better at “do these things on these servers”.
In my case I use Terraform to create proxmox VMs and then Ansible provisions and configures software on those VMs.
I’ve run a publicly accessible low-legitimate-traffic website that has been indexed by Google and others from my home network for >20 years without anything buckling so far. I don’t even have a great connection (30mbps upstream).
Maybe I’m just lucky?