

NixOS. It is like atomic, but more flexible.
If you like what I do, send me some Monero:
87ZN8URUY1M6GoXpxou4siDKJkLbLKDhT2RScrauzd4gbRyKgoY2ZX3Ut9WuMtkWebisViSE9EVRzVA1SD4kMdtAUPMiZBC


NixOS. It is like atomic, but more flexible.


Also, you could use ubuntu premium pro extra to get longterm kernel support for years. So even if the old driver would break with a future kernel version, you could then use that kernel version for a long time
NixOS. I came a long way and it combines the best of modular, customizable and immutable.
I also really like it, it is fast, OS native, has polkit integration for system files, LSP and linting works too, for example shellcheck for posix sh or bash scripts.
Have not used some of the features yet
Imagine running thunderbird and firefox on an info board
Lol, can agree, my grandpa is worse 💀


That guy is seriously impressive.
I want that code for the carving using a 3d printer!


Yeah right?? This might just be a small correction
Where does this work? I even tried the lemmy WebUI and didnt find such a feature


No, but as they do great work it is a shame that they dont protect it and thereby reduce the protection of every distro shipping them


Because we are users, contributors, packagers, distributors… and if the project is unsustainable and suddenly becomes proprietary that is bad.
Or if the project is included in proprietary systems. Nobody will have the right to get source code then, or in case of GPLv3 even the right to install other software.
Copyleft and GPLv3 grant users the rights to prevent e-waste or replace shitty proprietary software on useful hardware with better one.
Copyleft licenses spread these rights, while permissive ones do nothing apart from handing out software for nothing in return.


This. Licenses are so that trust is not needed and being a good FOSS citizen is expected. That means publishing your code if you fork, giving proper attibution and granting your users the same rights as the original project did.
Something very normal.


If they could just use a real licence and even more copyleft (at least something, like EUPL, MPL or GPLv2)
Well, PopOS is a distribution, based on Ubuntu, shipping a desktop. That desktop was formerly a customized GNOME, now they have their completely own desktop environment.
The tiling might be similar between both but their GNOME extension is probably deprecated now.
Cosmic has dynamic tiling, while KDE has many manual tiling features which may be less efficient but require nearly no setup.
This is not about GNOME…
Oversimplification. COSMIC lacks like 95% of what GNOME has that is important for regular users, like the vast extension ecosystem, GSConnect or remote RDP login as simple examples.
So not your choice either XD
It forces all traffic through the VPN. System apps dont need to follow it, user apps do
Postman.i2p?