I’m also on Mastodon as https://hachyderm.io/@BoydStephenSmithJr .

  • 2 Posts
  • 225 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 2nd, 2023

help-circle




  • Wikipedia doesn’t back me up. They say the playboy bunny outfits are stylized after the logo, and the logo was approved by Hef because: “The rabbit, the bunny, in America has a sexual meaning; and I chose it because it’s a fresh animal, shy, vivacious, jumping - sexy. First it smells you then it escapes, then it comes back, and you feel like caressing it, playing with it.”

    I think the “sexual meaning” he’s referring to is the “breed like rabbits” idiom but … even in that case, there seems to be a little more to it.


  • bss03@infosec.pubtomemes@lemmy.worldX rays
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Well, I think the general public probably is a bit confused about that. But, I think the disagreement is on the exposure of workers, and the practices around that.

    IIRC, nuclear reactors for power have surprisingly high operating costs, even tho the fuel costs are quite low, and most of those costs are radiation controls. (And, no one is saying we need to eliminate controls, just dial them back a bit based on better science of how radiation affects humans.)




  • bss03@infosec.pubtomemes@lemmy.worldX rays
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    There’s a current disagreement about radiation dosing policy right now, too. One side things the current approach is fine, the other believes that we are so overly conservative that we are wasting a lot of resources avoiding doses that are inconsequential. This is most relevant if we want to build and operate more nuclear reactors (e.g. for power), but it might also change some x-ray practices.

    But, there are few things that are absolutely safe. You can slip, fall, and die in the shower; you can “poison” yourself by drinking too much water. When a medical professional requests an x-ray, they believe the risk is worth the reward.






  • Yep, while I don’t use them myself, I saw the output of the latest models at the beginning of May. While there are some “good” things in it, the vast majority of the output was unnecessary maintenance load or just wrong. And, while the person showing off the output claimed they couldn’t have written the code, I didn’t see anything particularly special.

    On top of that, I don’t believe the output of Qwen (or any other coding model) can be distributed without violating a large number of copyrights, so it’s entirely inappropriate for FOSS projects.