minus-squarebufke@lemmy.todayOPtoPython@programming.dev•Django VTasks: a fast, asyncio-friendly Django 6.0 Task Backendlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-23 天前It can yes, but you may also run it as a separate process via a manage.py command. The scheduler will also work in either set up, and locks itself to running just once. So it’s safe to scale any way want. linkfedilink
bufke@lemmy.today to Python@programming.devEnglish · 3 天前Django VTasks: a fast, asyncio-friendly Django 6.0 Task Backendplus-squaregitlab.comexternal-linkmessage-square2fedilinkarrow-up114
arrow-up114external-linkDjango VTasks: a fast, asyncio-friendly Django 6.0 Task Backendplus-squaregitlab.combufke@lemmy.today to Python@programming.devEnglish · 3 天前message-square2fedilink
minus-squarebufke@lemmy.todayOPtoSelfhosted@lemmy.world•GlitchTip 5.2 with design refresh and less system requirementslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 个月前Thanks, I updated the post. It’s so easy to forget this. linkfedilink
bufke@lemmy.today to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 个月前GlitchTip 5.2 with design refresh and less system requirementsplus-squareglitchtip.comexternal-linkmessage-square2fedilinkarrow-up119
arrow-up119external-linkGlitchTip 5.2 with design refresh and less system requirementsplus-squareglitchtip.combufke@lemmy.today to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 个月前message-square2fedilink
It can yes, but you may also run it as a separate process via a
manage.pycommand. The scheduler will also work in either set up, and locks itself to running just once. So it’s safe to scale any way want.