I would trust the media recommendations of someone on drugs personally

You don’t think frontier AI models are leaving some out deliberately?

There’s a better way to use a butter knife, which is to slice a grid into the half avocado, after which you can use a spoon or your fingers to pop the cubes off into a bowl. Then you can put those in a bag in the freezer to have ripe avocado anytime.

It would be nice if these kinds of projects moved towards developing and using interoperable standards, so using something like XMPP seems like a good direction. It makes sense that people have different preferences and dealbreakers for software but it seems like it should be unnecessary for open source chat programs to be the subject of contentious arguments about which one people should use. The argument should be whether to keep using Discord etc. or switch to a unified open ecosystem, not Discord vs picking one of many separate small networks.

I guess using a non-internet connected gps device puts me somewhat out of the loop here but yeah you’re right

Even if it was a good idea to optimize traffic based on live data, it doesn’t seem to make a lot of sense for AI to be in the loop as opposed to just a normal algorithm, because the problem isn’t that dynamic. Maybe unless it’s so individual decisions are a black box and no one can be held accountable for them. Anyway, again, I think this example is just something the LLM thought sounded plausible and isn’t based on anything real.

I’m pretty sure the article itself is generated. This sort of refusal to commit to saying anything concrete is a hallmark of AI generated articles. The closest it comes to saying how AI is being used differently and it hedges with an “imagine this” sort of statement without references:

Now imagine AI in a different role. Instead of answering questions, it adjusts traffic lights as congestion builds. It balances electricity across a grid as demand shifts. It predicts equipment failures before they occur, reroutes freight around disruptions or continuously updates a digital model of an entire city as millions of people move through it.

Pretty sure lots of people are getting hit with the false positive rate on this shit

Pretty sure lots of people are getting hit with the false positive rate on this shit

because if you want to succeed let alone survive in life the attitude needs to change or it needs to hide.

Framing things this way is a big mistake and I don’t see why it isn’t more obvious to people that it’s a mistake. You want someone you care about to believe that there is a binary choice between a sustainable existence and resolving their emotional needs? You couldn’t make a more persuasive argument for suicidal thinking and self destructive behavior if you tried. And it isn’t even true because they are mutually dependent priorities. It took me too many years and therapy to figure this out, you should really consider approaching the issue from a different angle than this one.

In order to build the library you need access to Perforce, as that is where some of our dependencies live

…

If they do care, you probably just don’t see it because of the censorship

They will succeed too.

Maybe, except their games will get more and more shit, and there’s plenty of alternatives in terms of games to play.

I’ll wait, this looks good

Now I’m feeling paranoid about the degree to which hackernews comments are NSA run chatbots

Any service could leverage their pre-existing DRM scheme to let you sell your copy to someone else

But this would not be interoperable with other services, and to make it interoperable would require mutual trust and coordination between them that does not exist. Not to say that NFTs specifically are a solution here (video games are fungible after all, and porting physical ownership properties to digital goods is a problem these companies don’t want to solve to begin with), but there are actual reasons to use credibly neutral infrastructure and standards.

I highly recommend reading his book, this guy is an OG media pirate

So, what are good alternatives? Anything that accepts anonymous crypto payments and doesn’t have accounts?

This sucks, I still browse parts of reddit sometimes despite being banned and the redesign is terrible. I guess the frontend linked to seems to work, maybe that could be a solution, unless that’s using old.reddit itself.

So to use — in conversation, do you just say “em dash” in the middle of your sentence or what? Do you need hand gestures?