Applies to people too
Applies to people too

Grasshoppers liked my lettuce way too much. They can eat the plants outside of the net.


Maybe in hopes that youtubers and streamers will play the game on their channels if they got it for free? That’s probably what is meant by ‘to get content on our game’.
I don’t think it’s outrage bait because again, often the context is someone talking about themselves, and no arguments are started. But this didn’t used to be a thing, so what changed?


LLMs cannot distinguish between recent and out-of-date information in the context, and information in the model itself, learned during training (“dominant priors”), can often “outweigh” information we give it
LLM inference is more accurate when we give them examples (demonstrations) rather than just describing what we want.
Deep neural networks, including LLMs, struggle to learn patterns with long-range dependencies, at any scale of model. They will always be “driving in fog”, with local, short-range probabilities crowding out long-range ones. In case you were wondering why they suck at the “big picture” – probabilistically, it’s a blur.
I’d guess that what all this stuff adds up to is, sustainable use of LLMs as a coding tool for nontrivial projects calls for an entirely reworked set of software development practices to conform to its limitations effectively, but the people in charge really really want and believe it to be a drop-in efficiency boost, and a big mess results. This reminds me a lot of the articles and arguments I’ve read over the years about low level vs high level programming languages and frameworks. Probably will play out a similar way.
What’s with the trend of mentioning that people are white and connecting it with things they do? I also see live streamers do this a lot (including in reference to themselves) and it’s strange to me


Some seedbox services seem to accept cryptocurrency, although if they don’t accept an anonymous one like Monero then you’ll need to do some extra steps to remove the ability to trace the transactions. They may use a third party crypto payment service that will try to ID you so that’s another potential hurdle (after some googling I found a seedbox service that’s using bitpay, and bitpay has hassled me for using a VPN before). Possibly there’s a wider range of options with VPS providers.
I kind of have a hard time imagining such a thing being done with sincerely good intentions, how many people would really do that? Easy to imagine it as a way to exercise power over someone with a plausible pretense though.


Just imagine a world in which the only products manufactured are exclusively chasing the dollars of wealthy investors. So like yachts, custom giant statues, kill drone perimeters, etc.


11 degrees cooler is pretty good for a non-enclosed space without any forced air. Big fan of this technology, my swamp cooler only starts to struggle in 100+ temperatures, the electricity use is next to nothing compared to AC, and it’s a really simple machine to maintain and repair, like this video shows the core mechanism is just a small water pump.
Competing standards/conventions for tagging posts, supposedly
I also don’t know the full context but from what I’ve heard a big part of the issue is that on Mastodon (which is more twitter style) there isn’t a good universal way to tag and filter nsfw content, which means people who want to see it and people who do not can’t both get what they want in the same spaces.
Surely they have already been doing this

Proliferation of wifi routers does not necessarily mean there is a convenient central repository of their data, but I do see the risk
Wow thats great

You would need full coverage for that to work on its own, because as soon as you leave its range there’s ambiguity again about who the person being sensed is. Just disabling the camera probably would help in places where they aren’t dense enough for that.


I already committed to never giving EA money years ago but maybe this can get some more people in on that


This makes much more sense thanks
Isn’t it implied to be some kind of digital currency? Maybe it’s like accepting Paypal where Paypal can decide to make you jump through hoops to access your money or cut off your access entirely for seemingly arbitrary reasons.
I thought this bill did that, but it looks like they crossed out the consumer circumvention clauses anyway.