Howso?

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/3850209/how-to-reinstall-nvidia-drivers-that-dont-detect-g

This happens on windows too.

It at least means socialism isn’t a dirty word, still progress.

But yes of course you’re unfortunately correct.

https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/706889

there is at least this.

Why can’t it be both?

I don’t see how it’s subjective.

You’re confusing the olympiad with the erdos conjecture. This is just really not true, they just asked it and it found a solution, the mathmatician then used its solution as inspiration to create a better one. It still essentially did it on its own, and they certainly do the olympiad on their own.

I am not, you inaccurately said that the math olympiad was not bested by llm’s because they had a tool that told them if they were close but incorrect and can just try an infinite number of times. This is incorrect, they had a number of tries with python. This just isn’t a true statement. I think them besting it with use of python is equally significant and still counts as them besting it, and saying they can’t do math work is absurd.

I don’t know what you mean, I wasn’t the one who claimed they couldn’t do something they clearly can.

You aren’t, and that’s exactly what I’m saying, it’s capable of doing these things with tools, therefore it’s capable of doing these things.

I’m academically interested, what I mean when I say I’m not interested is that I just don’t see the significance when we’re talking about if it’s capable of the task.

The calculator does not tell them if they’re getting closer? This isn’t how anything works. No I can’t say I’m very interested in whether or not the llm has access to python/a calculator as long as it completes the task, that doesn’t matter.

It does the math, it just uses a calculator.

That doesn’t change the fact that llm’s are capable of acing math olympiads. So what if it uses tools? You probably would too. I doubt anybody there did it without a calculator.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-02343-x

It is totally irrelevant that the model calls tools to do the math. That is still a success.

No.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-02343-x

It’s lying

Whether they use tools to do it or not is entirely unimportant, that’s just how they do it?

They regularly win olympiad mathematics up from not standing a chance and just created a novel solution to the erdos conjecture, them counting the r’s in strawberry is inconsequential but also something they can do even if you just use the raw api or a local model.

I get that you hate AI but there’s no reason to lie about its capabilities.

Thunder is my preference

Nobody should be using steamos on a non-steam-deck so I don’t really see it mattering much, I basically never use desktop mode.