I am not, you inaccurately said that the math olympiad was not bested by llm’s because they had a tool that told them if they were close but incorrect and can just try an infinite number of times. This is incorrect, they had a number of tries with python. This just isn’t a true statement. I think them besting it with use of python is equally significant and still counts as them besting it, and saying they can’t do math work is absurd.

I don’t know what you mean, I wasn’t the one who claimed they couldn’t do something they clearly can.

You aren’t, and that’s exactly what I’m saying, it’s capable of doing these things with tools, therefore it’s capable of doing these things.

I’m academically interested, what I mean when I say I’m not interested is that I just don’t see the significance when we’re talking about if it’s capable of the task.

The calculator does not tell them if they’re getting closer? This isn’t how anything works. No I can’t say I’m very interested in whether or not the llm has access to python/a calculator as long as it completes the task, that doesn’t matter.

It does the math, it just uses a calculator.

That doesn’t change the fact that llm’s are capable of acing math olympiads. So what if it uses tools? You probably would too. I doubt anybody there did it without a calculator.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-02343-x

It is totally irrelevant that the model calls tools to do the math. That is still a success.

No.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-02343-x

It’s lying

Whether they use tools to do it or not is entirely unimportant, that’s just how they do it?

They regularly win olympiad mathematics up from not standing a chance and just created a novel solution to the erdos conjecture, them counting the r’s in strawberry is inconsequential but also something they can do even if you just use the raw api or a local model.

I get that you hate AI but there’s no reason to lie about its capabilities.

Thunder is my preference

Nobody should be using steamos on a non-steam-deck so I don’t really see it mattering much, I basically never use desktop mode.

This is a problem for all politicians not exclusively communist ones. At least the communist ones are saying the right things, even if they’re lying, the important thing is that they’re held accountable for their lies.

The question is irrelevant, we should get as close as possible, and certainly enslaving people is no way to get there. you would have to be insane to not have utopia as the ultimate goal of political power, even if it is unachievable it should obviously be the goal.

Is there a reason one should care? The only engines I know are of any interest are UE and godot

They do not care about implementing communism genuinely, it’s a propaganda tactic, you are aware politicians lie, right? This is akin to saying “I’m in the party of building an egalitarian utopia!” And then immediately enslaving half the population. Then you announce actually utopia is bad because this guy is bad. You would have to be an incredible fool to take their word for it and not look at their actions. To think that you think this is an anticommunist gotcha and not a clear case of lying to the public is embarrassing on your part.

The only problem with this thing is the damn d-pad, it seems.

Literally the opposite of the definition laid out by marx but I think you’re trying to be funny and failing