It’s like 40 min long, it’s worth it but maybe not if you have to debug

crashing more means nothing about the safety of the car and everything about the safety of the average driver of the car, unless the manufacturer is directly at fault for the crash somehow. This is an unfixable problem and has nothing to do with whether it was gas or electric. The variables were not isolated at all.

I wish so very badly that money had gone to immortal gates of pyre, it’s better in every way except budget.

Do you know about cosmic? Might want to use a kde distro for now, that’s still cooking.

They are not adjusting their models at any cost to other benchmarks. Especially when the benchmark isn’t even public. This would be very easily caught.

no, they don’t have agi, but this benchmark isn’t proof of that either way, an ai that’s dumber than a human could still be agi

They get 85% on the last benchmark, this one was specifically designed to stump them, when the last one came out everyone said the same things as this go around.

will anyone be retracting their statements when they get to 85% on this one?

Can you tell me how to reverse sort a list in python?

My point is that people should stop pointing this out or caring and that it’s not a real problem. As was my point in the original comment.

I don’t find the problem compelling enough to warrant a solution.

why should I care about this misunderstanding that can easily be remedied with even the most basic cursory research?

there are countless things we do this with, rivers don’t run, they flow

even with computers we have called processing “thinking” for ages and nobody ever cared

cities are actually not even capable of sleep either.

I think this is a problem that doesn’t matter at all even a little. Can you tell me why we should even try?

That doesn’t really work either, that adds synthesizing to the terminology but doesn’t describe most of the behaviors they have. It’s not reasoning or simulating either.

Give me a better solution? How do I talk about the behaviors it exhibits without anthropomorphizaton?

Nobody is talking about muffon but I think it’s very close to perfect.

Yeah but saying all that is annoying so I think we should stick with saying thinking and everyone knowing what we mean isn’t literally identical to thought. Do you have a better solution?

If it hits that It’ll go much higher very quickly, linuxes problems are literally all related to marketshare or need a few more years of ironing out the wayland transition… which by then will likely be done.

CentOS has nothing to do with that and existed no more or less at the whims of its company than any other distro run by a specific group of maintainers, if the manjaro corp failed the exact same thing would happen to it.

If you don’t like the immutability then use nobara.

Tbh I don’t think the issues with immutability are CURRENTLY there.

you said this:

“Entirely community-driven (so suffer much less from corporate influence, and are better from the Linux “freedom” standpoint compared to Fedora, OpenSUSE, etc.)”

give me one example of a time this mattered

“Widely adopted (have extensive communities supporting the repos, a large knowledge base and active forums)”

fedora obviously has this.

“Not heavily opinionated (allow proprietary programs, work with systemd, etc.)” And this.

i conclude that you have still not made any case that there is even one reason to use manjaro that isn’t the cost of switching.

that’s not an argument to what I said in fact it’s basically exactly what I said, manjaro users only use manjaro because it’s what they’re already using, not because it’s better designed for any particular usecase.

“There’s literally no reason to use this distro that isn’t just that you’re already used to it.” Was exactly what I said.

you’re right, I oversimplified, bazzite is great because it’s unhindered by patents and preinstalls the drivers, I’d recommend a community fedora fork, the key being that it’s much easier to turn fedora into this than arch.

manjaro is this but with way more footguns, I say this having maintained a bunch of manjaro systems for people, switching them to bazzite fixed nearly all of my maintenance burden, because it’s easy to remove them from fedora but impossible with arch, intentionally, and by design.

If you want something easy that just works arch is very deliberately designed to not be that, on purpose, even.

If you want slightly faster stable then you probably want something like https://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Slowroll

which does exactly that but has a competent team backing it.

or even fedora, really.

My recommendation for someone that needs an appstore with a gui is fedora, manjaro is terrible for this, because they have an appstore that regularly breaks and requires cli intervention anyway, if having a gui for package management is important to you manjaro is a terrible choice, as is arch in general.

read some of the comments here, this is not uncommon, and it’s a fundamental issue with the design of arch package management that has been completely resolved elsewhere.

No, I do not agree at all that that is a valid usecase for manjaro. Anybody who needs a distro that works out of the box and is convenient shouldn’t even be considering anything arch based.