

Me using an android as a child taught me how to use linux, command line etc. seems arbitrary to deny the phone entirely. maybe certain online services should be though


Me using an android as a child taught me how to use linux, command line etc. seems arbitrary to deny the phone entirely. maybe certain online services should be though


Thoughts on the drawing ai tools https://odysee.com/@grockster:b/even-better-real-time-render-and-inpaint:b


This is why i replay final fantasy x several times but will never finish it myself. I don’t want it to end


you only need to get caught once for the lock


With the slow release cadence of game development cycles we’re not missing much. It will probably be even slower next gen unless AI really does backflips


They will continue to release multiplayer games on pc so it will be the “best of both worlds” for sony
Why is that? LLM can generate readable code that can be reviewed prior to merging into the main branch. If you work in small pieces reducing risk.
The requirement from the start was byte-for-byte identical output from both pipelines. The result was about 25,000 lines of Rust, and the entire port took about two weeks. The same work would have taken me multiple months to do by hand. We’ve verified that every AST produced by the Rust parser is identical to the C++ one, and all bytecode generated by the Rust compiler is identical to the C++ compiler’s output. Zero regressions across the board:
Seems like a non-issue.


Not exactly, they made him remove the RDR 2 vr mod. the GTA is still up on github.
this is a terms of service issue, but they’re using dmca (copyright) to enforce.
he technically has a case for selling, but defending it would be too expensive. LR also isn’t socially adept so he’s self-sabatoged himself too.
organizations buying by the dozens is good for openai and it shows they can get cash flow vs free users that are only taking up resources.
it’s probably going to be like youtube


These same people now just use AI do do their shit jobs.
You followed up with the same people from then, or is this more speculation?
I’m getting the sense that the people with the strongest opinions on ai in coding have the least amount of experience.


this is why i won’t invest in games with DRM and games lacking a good single player experience. MMO’s the exception
this could have had a nice campaign mode with a multiplayer mode added. even if community moved on you would still have a story to go back to.
in today’s reality art and mechanics live at the mercy of the publisher unless someone reverse engineers the backend ~~


That’s not even how the development process works, but i guess your “respect” means a lot these days


I posted a response in another reply but thats for sharing something. still does not support the claim of dog-shit developers


it’s wild that someone who doesn’t program would degrade others who can because the majority of developers who use ai-based tools.
If it degrades brains with use in writing Essays.
The study does not prove that claim. Better to link directly to the study https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08872
The study does suggest only relying on ChatGPT could reduce engagement in the specific task of essay writing and harms recall. It does not prove ChatGPT is causing individuals to become less intelligent in the act of programming.
There are many studies that shows the potential positive outcomes when utilizing LLMs
[2512.13658] Embedding-Based Rankings of Educational Resources based on Learning Outcome Alignment: Benchmarking, Expert Validation, and Learner Performance https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13658
[2509.15068] Learning in Context: Personalizing Educational Content with Large Language Models to Enhance Student Learning https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.15068


if that makes you feel better, but i wish you responded to the original claim with data vs ad hominem. but if you’re so good can i view your github to learn how you program?


a career that requires one to know exactly how their code works in case it breaks
Using AI doesn’t mean that you lose the ability to reason, debug, or test generated code. All code merge should be peer-reviewed and tested
We’re not discussing images, nor planes.
The claim was tech savvy people, the same people who are most opposed to AI.
There’s data that to suggest otherwise. people who are technically inclined engage with AI more and have a more positive reception compared to less experienced users.
Unless you have additional data to support that they are in-fact “dog-shit programmers”, this appears to be an emotional claim colored by your own personal bias. Though if you’re a “pure” programmer who is better than the dog-shit developers I would love to see some of your work or writings.


an elitist response.
here’s actual data https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2025/ai
half use AI tools daily
Professionals show a higher overall favorable sentiment (61%) than those learning to code (53%).


the same people who are most opposed to AI.
programmers almost exclusively use LLM
was published over a year ago