I want to use GNOME as what it does works great, but it lacks a whole list of features I use.
Watch the list actually get longer over time.
I want to use GNOME as what it does works great, but it lacks a whole list of features I use.
Watch the list actually get longer over time.
Sure they are, but system apps are still installed in the immutable space initially, which is the important thing, that updates to it can’t go there.
I don’t know how desktop immutable systems deal with that.
Another prominent example is Android. Sure system apps can be upgraded individually – by storing the new version in a restricted part of the ‘user’ partition – but otherwise the system files are strictly read only until a new ‘image’ is ‘flashed’ to it by the update system or a power user with debugging tools. In the past, a common use of root capabilities was to remount the system partition as read/write and then change files on it directly. It’s more complex now.
That’s also why system apps can be rolled back to the stock version, and can sometimes be disabled, but can’t be directly uninstalled like user apps. Only the updated version on the user partition (if there is one) can be removed.
What is it? Even the article does not say
Wayland is still too broken for him?
Software and hardware support definitely counts.
I would also guess that probably a lot of Microsoft enterprise stuff like active directory group policies likely aren’t supported well, but I don’t have enough knowledge to back that up.