right, but remote code execution comes in many different ways. Having a machine vulnerable to this kind of privilege escalation is a really bad thing.

We know your full name, blood type, and that your left elbow is itching a bit right now. Your browser told us. But we’re choosing to not show you. We also know what you did on July 14, 2018.

This is evil. Fuck it. I want nothing to do with these cunts anymore. I’m degoogling this year.

how do you do, fellow human

I too, enjoy the company of blackjack and to play hookers

I’ve always enjoyed just using a hyphen surrounded by spaces for readability - but even I am hesitant to do that lately

I was wondering the other day if there is a list of LLM-isms somewhere, like “It’s not X, but Y”, em-dashes, overly confident statements, etc

edit: https://github.com/NousResearch/autonovel/blob/master/ANTI-SLOP.md

yeah, I bet there was a bunch of crap written 30y ago too, the difference was no npm or github

wdym by duplicating?

not bad, I’ll keep myself a fake stache around just in case

I’ve been seeing this for a long time now, as they blocked VPN and anonymous access, so I use a combination of cached pages and libredirect if I really want to bother going there.

good, I’ll add vetted models to my blocklist

every website will start blocking VPN IPs, more so than what some already do, which is exactly what these cunts want

and it’ll take a few million years for Andromeda to get the news

micro for sensible defaults out of the box, and because I don’t like modal editors.

Bitwarden’s npm distribution pipeline stayed compromised for approximately 19 hours and 334 developers had enough time to pull the malicious package before it was caught.

It was actually about 90 minutes

Everyone running bw in a CI pipeline just handed the attackers whatever else happened to live on that machine.

only if they installed bw in that time window

Otherwise yes, I agree it’d be better if the CLI was written in a non-JS/TS ecosystem. Perhaps Rust or Go. And the criticisms to list including secrets are super valid.

ah right, and my eyes need to be recreated because they can’t see ultraviolet

Barely. Even with the code and seeds, it’s still a struggle to do that. There’s plenty of questions from people running pytorch and tensorflow models that can’t reproduce results. Maybe you isolate enough variables that consecutive runs actually produce the same output, but the study is about commercial models. You’ll never get deterministic output from those.

You’d expect the same answer each time. It’s the same photo, the same model, the same question. But you won’t get the same answer.

I don’t know what ads show that, but anyone who knows the first thing about LLMs knows you don’t get the same answer twice.

I’d get this expectation 5 years ago when most people weren’t familiar with it, but come on… you don’t need to feed it an image 500 times to see that.

Waste of energy. It’s like asking a person to estimate a non-trivial angle. Either use a model trained for that task, or don’t bother.

Exactly, it’s only an improvement until they’re bought and we’re all in the same boat again. We need a federated forge and open standards.