No, this is about adding guidelines for tool-generated submissions to the kernel. The tailwind conversation was on making their documentations more accessible to AI tools.

Linus doesn’t want to add guidelines to not fuel any side of the whole discussion, and says that adding guidelines won’t solve the problem because a lot of times it’s not trivial to detect whether or not a contribution was written with AI tools, after all, “documentation is for good actors”, hinting that anyone contributing AI slop is not expected to respect it anyway.

because it does make prototyping/MVP faster, and unfortunately it’s difficult for some to see that having no human who can actually understand the codebase is a terrible idea in the medium and long term

I’ve never had to look for disabling middle click paste because it broke panning or orbiting in 2d or 3d canvas. Same thing for games, middle click works just fine there.

yeah, I use it all the time to copy username and password in one go instead of fiddling with the clipboard history

soulless and dull

it seems you have read my documentation

704kB !

But if you are looking for a job that AI will definitely create, by the millions, I have a suggestion: digital asbestos removal.

already happening

more managers should be aware of this

whether you learn something new or not it’s up to you, not the ai

likewise, you can copy and paste from SO and learn nothing

plz bruh, we even have telnet, u can trust, profesh work guarantee

based

Tux is flexing

laughs in bezos

or just topgrade to update everything

deleted by creator

I use it everyday and I still hate pacman’s flags with a passion

sounds like he’s frustrated that a clean architecture didn’t magically solve all of his problems

“Anywhere you have your password manager” is useful

Zen has also committed to not include AI features

that is fine, the only requirement AFAIK is the user being in the docker group in case you’re having permission issues running it as user