It’s a bit of a grey area (it should go to the relevant section, but if it doesn’t just scroll to the bullet list at the very bottom)

It is as soon as you use LoRa. Reticulum is just an overlay

Since you seem to be in good faith: no, you’re wrong. Using a language cannot force you into adopting a licence, because automatically everything you produce will be all rights reserved unless otherwise specified. It’s then up to the developer to choose a license.

Rust doesn’t even populate the license metadata in your manifest, it’s up to you.

I think MIT dominance came about thanks to GitHub’s choose a license.

Cargo doesn’t create a LICENCE for you, and it doesn’t set the metadata like npm. It even tells you to go choose a license when you try to publish a crate without one

Very ingenious approach too!

deleted by creator

Yes, exactly. But at least you can have an e2e encrypted relay as syncthing does.

This problem is similar to the one faced by Matrix on iOS, and they provide the notification service. All of your conclusions apply though.

This could be worked around, in theory

gpx.studio

Edit: it’s a web app but maybe it works offline. I have never tried

When you begin hosting you have to wait a bit before your email doesn’t go to spam, at least that was my experience in 2018.

Edit: I just checked and I can now deliver to Hotmail/MS365 too!

deleted by creator

This should be at the top

Nice

What are you using for Heating? Is it house heating or physical warm up?

eBlocker does indeed seem German. It’s also much more than PiHole (it MITMs your packets, it seems) https://eblocker.org/en/how-eblocker-works/

eBlocker uses SSL bumping with a unique root certificate to decrypt possibly encrypted TCP/IP packets. After this deep packet inspection a pattern matching to the target URI is performed. In case of a match, the request is answered by the eBlocker (instead of being sent to the target URI).

As a slightly less accurate alternative, eBlocker uses DNS blocking for fallback, where the domains of known data collectors are blocked. This way, even devices that do not allow to install root certificates are also protected.

Beware! Now there’s a hardware revision for a TP-Link router (I think the C7) that is not supported by OpenWrt and never will

Here you can find some data, but it seems different (the data, not only the representation) from OP’s

There’s ReFS, but I don’t know if it’s better

I didn’t know

I have a USB-C to MicroUSB adapter that was about 3€