It doesn’t need nearly as many. AI inference is orders of magnitude more expensive than a single search query (ignoring the fact that Google does it’s own inference with search queries now). And that doesn’t even include training, which is stupidly expensive to do.

deleted by creator

I’m a senior engineer of 10+ years. I do not, nor will I ever, use AI to write code. Fuck that shit. It makes everything worse in countless ways. So much garbage I have to deal with at work now because of it, and it absolutely has made no difference in velocity. I take that back actually, it’s slowed things down because now there’s a lot more “what the fuck is this shit” reviews I have to do now, which just slows everything down. Like just the other day where someone on my team submitted a MR where the AI wrote a pre-commit hook that ran a script to parse the source code of our entire monorepo to scan for occurrences of a few functions to make sure they weren’t used.

I have to deal with so many “ideas” now that no sane person would ever come up with, because they are fucking stupid.

Oh, and I can’t tell you how many times I’ve had to tell people to remove absolutely useless tests from MRs. It’s almost a joke at this point.

The good news it’s already starting to get way too expensive to keep on like this and management is finally starting to feel the pain, so I doubt it really has much legs left. It always comes down to money, in the end, and this shit isn’t cheap and will only continue to skyrocket in price as the wildly unprofitable AI companies run out of money and need to start showing profitability.

That’s not lying. There’s nothing linguistic about numerical computation.

What, praytell, is this supposed syntax? A curl invocation? Including a link to a CDN resource in an HTML <script> tag?

A URL on the web is not what anyone would call a framework, I’m sorry to say. Is www.google.com a framework? Google programmed the server serving the content at that URL, right? Or what, is it only special URLs that only programmers use? Is your operating system a “framework”? Someone programmed that too, right? How about your coffee maker? That’s also something someone programmed.

Maybe, just maybe, it has a more narrow definition than “someone programmed it so you don’t have to”.

As someone that grew up in a Christian household and wasn’t allowed to listen to non-Christian music, I listened to a LOT of Skillet as a teenager. It was one of the few bands I could listen to that I actually liked. I also liked DC Talk as a kid.

Just because code is open source doesn’t mean shit code can’t be called out. Shit code is shit code.

Don’t worry, cult membership is flexible.

Not sure what you’re trying to say. Are you saying this is a good thing?

Because people want to be free from being bombarded by AI slop.

What are you talking about? What citations?

deleted by creator

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_data_type

Some reading material for you. Sum types allow for proper, compiler-enforced error handling and optionality rather than the unprincipled free for all that is exceptions and nullability.

Tony Hoare, the person that originally introduced nulls to the programming world, is oft-quoted as calling nulls the “billion dollar mistake”. Here’s the talk: https://www.infoq.com/presentations/Null-References-The-Billion-Dollar-Mistake-Tony-Hoare/.

Nulls are absolutely pervasive in Java and NPEs are not avoidable. At minimum, most of the ecosystem uses nulls, so most any library will have nulls as part of its interface. Null is an inhabitant of every type in Java (even Optional, ironically). You cannot escape it. It’s a fundamental flaw in the design of the language.

Btw, you also can’t escape it in Typescript, either, due to unsoundness of the type system and the fact that many types for libraries are bolted on to the original JS implementation and may possibly be inaccurate. But still, it’s a lot less likely than Java.

Why are you talking about functional programming? Python sure as hell isn’t FP.

I can only speak to Nebraska, but the malls here have all of those things except for record stores (for obvious reasons), and the number of malls has not changed in decades. They’re all in various central locations of Lincoln and Omaha and are very much community spaces. Tons of families come to let their kids play in the play spaces (especially lower-income families), teenagers hang out at the mall with their friends, and so on.

I qualified my statement, so not sure what you were hoping to achieve with your comment.

Also, that can happen for any number of reasons that are entirely unrelated to whether or not malls are dead. Like, for example, Amazon offering an obscene amount of money to the owner of the mall to buy it out for the real estate.

This is pretty much what my local mall looks like right now. The whole “all the malls died out” thing is mostly a myth, in my experience. Every time I go it’s absolutely full of people.

I have never witnessed this supposed “dying out”. All the malls in my area are decked out for Christmas and have tons of people there all the time. I’ve been multiple times myself even in the last couple of months.

People always talk about this as a given, but I’ve never actually seen it. Ultimately, malls are one of the few remaining third spaces that you can be for free. That matters a lot.

Not like that at my local mall at all. Decorations everywhere and more people than ever.