• 1 Post
  • 61 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle


  • My friend is an indie game developer and he once told me the typical refund rate, which I think was only a little lower than this. I don’t think the game length is playing that large a role here, rather people use that refund policy as a way to try out a game (like a demo). Probably most of the people who refunded wouldn’t have bought it in the first place without that refund policy, so he shouldn’t really view this as “because of this policy I lost 55K sales”.







  • What does it mean for a project to deserve the [AI] tag? This matters, because you may have a lot of projects where a developer may think “no” and someone else thinks “yes”. Some examples from my day job:

    • Developer used AI to understand part of the codebase and suggest ways to accomplish goal. Developer incorporated that suggestion, though using their own knowledge deviated from AI’s suggestion in parts. Developer wrote the code themselves. Is this project [AI] or [NOT AI]?
    • Developer used AI to review existing (human-written) code for quality and security purposes. AI noticed some issues and proposed fixes. Developer reviewed and accepted them. Is this project [AI]?
    • Developer knew they wanted to implement a feature, and while implementing it there was a boilerplate function. Developer asked AI to write this function, manually reviewed it, confirmed it worked, and added it to the codebase. Is this project [AI]?

    In these examples the developer carefully reviews the AI’s output, which I think distinguishes it from vibe-coded slop, which at least is what I want to ignore.

    It’s also worth noting that an open-source project may receive and incorporate a well-written contribution where the human developer used AI carefully like this. Unless they disclosed that they used AI, it may be unknowable to the project maintainers whether their project is [AI] or not, depending on how you define it. What tag should these projects use?






  • festus@lemmy.catoComics@lemmy.blahaj.zoneTheory
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago
    Spoiler - enjoy story first

    One solution for the ending would be if they advance the simulation by a couple trillion years in an instant. Then the layer below them, and very likely themselves, can feel safe that their universe won’t just end because the computer above them turned off. Then they can go and behave as if they’re the top-layer, as they will be for subsequent simulations they perform.

    The one downside is that they then can’t expect any help or benevolence from the layer above them, but in my opinion if you realize that your universe is being simulated on a 1 week-old experimental processor, you should want it to finish simulating your universe’s remaining history asap before it breaks down for whatever reason.


  • festus@lemmy.catomemes@lemmy.worldLife in your 30s
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    26 days ago

    I’m top-left (my job pays well, it’s engaging, and it has a positive impact on the world).

    I have some friends in a 5th category that are hyper-busy with traveling, social engagements, etc. I feel like I have to book time with them weeks in advance.


  • Yeah, that’s why I think AWS can’t support this situation. If the US doesn’t drop their order, I think the only way Anthropic could commercialize these models would be if they disallowed any API usage and tied authentication to developer-specific accounts. So your employer might pay for every eligible employee to have an account, and Anthropic validates their citizenship, but there’s no using Fable for automated code review or QA or whatever; all use must be restricted and tied to specific authorized humans. That completely rules out AWS.


  • Well right now the model is entirely turned off, but it seems the US government wants Anthropic (and I guess as a result AWS) to first verify that you have US citizenship before they’ll enable it on your account. It’s not just blocking on where your IP is located; non-US citizens living in the United States are supposed to be denied access. So in your scenario, AWS wouldn’t enable Fable on your account until I guess you show them your passport or something. Though I think even that won’t be enough; what if the AWS account is for an America company and later they have a non-US citizen employee? I’m not sure AWS Bedrock can support this use-case.