Confirmed: the only divine church is the Church of Emacs.

!lemmydrama@lemmy.world probably fits to bill.

Should be now, OP changed it to a link to Google.

The best part is that this won’t even work, the max page size in Lemmy is 100.

BTW, there’s a bug in Lemmy where editing out a URL won’t work over federation, you’ll need to change the URL to something else to remove it.

user being scolded was the one who brought it up.

I mean, they (the Tesseract dev) didn’t? Someone else said Tesseract moved to Argentina and changed its name, like that’s obviously about the Nazis.

Also, ‘get some therapy’, why are you assuming they’re mentally unwell?

Seems to be a bug in Piefed’s linkify code for punycode. It’s transforming the the double hypen into an en dash.

It’s relatively cheap (for Google), buys them a lot of good will and gets people contributing to the stack most of Google depends on.

A Meccha Chameleon champion in the making.

I mean, they wouldn’t have to ban TotallyNotJessica or femcel memes if blahaj as a whole is banned, they’d both be caught in the instance ban.

The dev behind the Tesseract (a webapp for Lemmy) has a big list of users, communities and instances that Tesseract uses to filter things out. This list is obfuscated so it’s harder and there’s no way for someone hosting it to disable the filter. The meme about the nearly 3,000 users that this list filters.

Same, clearly I need to start posting spicier takes.

*drums fingers on table*… Elegy is Shadow of Intent’s best album.

‘Not attracted to men’ is probably what you’re trying to say. Lesbians can still have men in their lives that they depend on, just not in a romantic/sexual sense.

So real. Need to start complaining about paywalled articles more.

The part that bothers me isn’t the specific ban on LLM projects, or the specific ban on cryptocurrency projects. It’s that a hub built around “free software” is now telling its users which kinds of software are deemed good and which are not, and that is closer to censorship than it might seem. Once a platform writes into its terms that an entire category “harms its reputation” and can be removed on that basis, the deciding factor stops being whether the code is legal, or functional, or useful, and becomes whether it aligns with a position the platform has taken. […] Every platform I can think of that took this approach became divisive the moment it started enforcing an ideology on its users, whatever that ideology happened to be, and however justified it looked at the time.

As acknowledged, Codeberg already doesn’t allow non-free software on it, that is itself pushing an ideology on its users. Extending this stance to other forms of software isn’t the big deal the author is making it out to be, software being free doesn’t absolve it of other moral implications.

We now even have people like Linus Torvalds making the fairly reasonable argument that an LLM is just a tool, and “clearly a useful one”

Appeal to authority. See this response.

Why is "^Yuri|^WholesomeYuri" in the community name filter? Why are anime lesbians hard blocked, while ani.social is just in the default user filter?

Filtered communities on instances that aren’t blocked: lemmy.ml/c/worldnews

ml is in the instance filter?

I mean it’s not like ‘closed’ AI is an especially great business.

If Moonshot were selling traditional software, adding millions of users would be relatively easy. Instead, every new customer increases the company’s infrastructure bill, capping its growth.

This is just how software service companies work?

How the hell do you make a living off interactive LLM slop (but with a school girl veneer!) and not know about Microsoft’s Tay? This was what was always going to happen.

Workers at ZA/UM once again facing the consequences of its managers decisions. Sad as ZP is by most accounts genuinely pretty good, though I haven’t got around to playing it myself yet.