I wish he went into more detail about the situation with the police seeming to collude with this business owner to harass and intimidate ben. That’s the bigger story.

The legos and sick old man are the hook, but the meat of this situation is a corrupt police department colluding with a local church to protect a corrupt business owner.

Like even if Ben were just a total troll and was in the wrong… These cops have completely fucked themselves if it gets federally investigated. It’s cut and dried federal conspiracy by Utahs statutes. 5 to life per count. Basically a law designed for officials.

The unredacted bodycam stuff is wild.

This is not making you sound smarter, my guy…

The 2008 example is completely unrelated to your original claim. Taxpayers did not own 50% of the banks, and they still got bailed out. So clearly ownership is not what creates bailout risk…?

Bailouts are political decisions made under claims of systemic risk. They are not an automatic legal consequence of owning shares.

The AI proposal is about companies paying a one-time tax in stock, meaning existing owners (read: Billionaires) give up equity into a public fund. If the companies fail, those shares can go to zero. That is equity risk.

It does not mean taxpayers become the company’s creditors, guarantors, or emergency piggy bank.

You started by claiming public ownership makes taxpayers responsible for losses. Now you’re arguing that the government sometimes bails industries out even without public ownership. That’s a different argument, and it actually undermines your first one.

Like dude you got some upvotes on your first comment and it had appeal to people but it didn’t come from a person who read the article or knows what the fuck they’re talking about. And every time you respond to me you give it away more and more. Quit while you’re ahead and stay in school.

They get voting power and upside.

They do not automatically inherit the company’s debts or become legally obligated to bail it out.

If I own 50% of a corporation and it fails, my equity can go to zero. That is the risk of owning shares. It does not mean I personally owe the company’s creditors money, and it does not mean I am required to rescue the company with more cash.

Stay in school, please. Still not convinced you’ve read the article at all.

If you read the article instead of making a knee jerk assumption, you’d know that taxpayers would not be purchasing 50% of the industry.

The proposal is for AI companies to pay a one-time tax. In stock. Which would go into a public sovereign wealth fund. If the companies succeed, the public benefits. If they fail, the public-owned shares lose value.

That does not magically make taxpayers responsible for bailing them out. Owning equity is not the same thing as guaranteeing a company’s survival.

It’s not a liability if it’s given to you.

Bro tried dabs for the first time

And then oh no twitter is t worth nearly what I bought!

I know!! I’ll buy it with Tesla. That way Teslas profits will offset the twitter losses.

Oh no! Elon gets outed as a Nazi by doing a very public Nazi salute, and fucks up foreign aid and the federal government with a bunch of shit stain kids! And now Tesla isn’t in any of the deals Elon wanted to get by playing politics, Now Teslas aren’t doing well!

I know!! I’ll buy Tesla with spaceX…

Elon musk is a human pyramid scheme. And 401ks are holding the bag on his eventual rug pull.

As someone who was a certified cicerone, you got no idea how accurate this is.

Make no mistake. Everyone who gets into alcohol did so because they like to be drunk. A significant proportion are alcoholics.

Nobody asked you to not summarize, but here you are.

Under promise and over deliver is still king.

“I cannot guarantee something won’t go sideways. I need at least 3 weekends of overtime available to be certain before it’s released.”

Deliver it 10 days later. Or 12, after relaxing for a day or two.

Your timeframe stands. New project? Do it again. Give yourself ~100-150% extra room.

sad Mavis Beacon sounds

It tells me my job is safe, which is nice.

To assume the creator of rsync is vibe coding because they used AI is ridiculous.

Wareham?

Shoreham.

I bring up nouns you can verb all the time. It’s a great ice breaker, especially because so many are bodily functions. You can poop a poop. You can pee pee. You can fart a fart.

You can smell a smell, you can run an run, you can cough a cough, you can text text, you can photograph a photograph…

I mean if it describes what you do accurately then they won’t be able to say much other than yes.

Tell that to Louis ck

So oddly tier iii is just tier 2. Most places don’t have a tier 2.

1 years experience as sysadmin is great. Here’s the neat little trick no one tells you: what you say your job is on your resume should reflect WHAT YOU DO. Not the title of what you were hired for

Are you doing dev ops at a small outfit as a support engineer? Your resume should not say “support engineer.” It should say what your tasks reflect to the market. Not what some dude said your position is.

I had this issue with workday job applications and my alma mater. Just wasn’t in their list. And Ive never had a single response from a single workday application.

So good luck to all 15000 students and ~300000 alums out there 🤙😎

I’m sure the job postings will say, but many dev ops roles are looking for someone with senior experience. Like 8-10 years or the resume is ignored.

Id say the way to beat this is look for tier iii roles for folks that don’t know what they need is dev ops. Explain the value of what you want to do as a sysadmin to bring value. Then just write dev ops on your resume when you wind up doing dev ops.