Wtf, why do we have the same wallpaper?
Wtf, why do we have the same wallpaper?
What is your point exactly?
May I ask why LMDE and not regular Linux Mint? In my experience, it is rock solid and handles nvidia pretty well, too
Heck yeah! There’s so much gatekeeping and tribalism that it kinda sucks out the joy a little bit
Yay! Happy to help! :)
Hmm, not sure about this, but do you have duplicate system trays/disks & devices widget?
Where were you when yay/paru was kill
I was at home trying to yay
when:
yay: error while loading shared libraries: libalpm.so.14: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
No
I have no hdr and other shenanigans but I’ve been using auto login via sddm for my plasma wayland session since a long time and it works.
It wouldn’t help with user config issues, though
Consider having just two of them. The one which is active actually seems like a button that demands attention. It’s basic design stuff. Tabs denote choices between active viewports, it should be unambiguous always which one is active. These hovering tabs are more like buttons which intuitively ask to be clicked
https://github.com/black7375/Firefox-UI-Fix
Try looking at the comparison screenshots in this repo. Or look up some images of firefox australis. You’ll see how tabs are actually behaving like tabs and are denoting clearly which one is active by linking itself naturally to the viewport
Edit: https://github.com/Glitchcode2447/Firefox-Australis-Theme
I think this is a big accessibility issue. Please let tabs be tabs. This design seems too similar to Firefox’s new design where it’s hard to tell which tab is active (specially if you have only two open). I feel like tabs should be attached to the viewport/content otherwise they look like buttons where my intuition is to click on an active to tab to activate it
I think it kicks in when you distribute. For example, let’s say I have a fork of some GPL software and I’m maintaining it for myself. I don’t need to share the changes if I’m the only one using it.
The point is that people using a software should be able to read and modify (and share) the source when they want to.
IANAL and all that good stuff
I agree, but this is mostly an issue with permissive licenses like MIT. GPL and its variants have enough teeth in them to deal with shit like this. I’m scared of the rising popularity of these permissive licenses. A lot of indie devs have somehow been convinced by corpos that they should avoid the GPL and go with MIT and alike
Fair enough. But IIRC there’s a couple well made org mode android apps. I think orgzly was the name
Edit: also emacs does run on android!
Which is completely separate from having a meaningful user base (near you), so 🤷
Yep, this unfortunately seems to be a much hard problem
That’s emacs with org-roam
This is not right on multiple levels. Google, or at least the chromium team were not interested in implementing jxl at all
I don’t really care for online dating, but I remember coming across this. They claimed to be open source.
There’s dozens of us!