But that would help the poor and not just be a protection for donors

This is unironivally what switch my dual boot to just linux. Drive was failing. ext4 on linux handled it no hicups, windows crashed hard nevet came back.

Bad form. Breaks SLSA some. Breaks some CVE tracking tools too.

If the patch introduces a vulnerabilty or breaking issue how would it be tracked?

Its crazy that this is the only sane option mentioned in this thread. Like its not a reasonable justification because the insane low trust situatuin we are in and no attempts to mitigate risks being heavily advertised first.

I think Mozilla’s controversial “Deplatforming is not enough” lays out a better strategy for “the algorithm” problem to me.

Having big tech be able to work in secret to pick anf choose what content isnt allowed and then being super charged by the state to do it for them as well just doesnt sit well with me

Cars are useful where rual living makes sense. The sense breaks down fast if you dont need to pass acres of fields.

Motivation is powetful influence on devolopment. The linux kernel is largley driven by UX and desire for technical excellence (there are ultier motive from some major factions but overall this is true and actions are judged publically as such).

Microsoft is, like most companies, driven by stockholder value creation.

One produces an enviroment in which cautious adoption of new tech is constant, a slow trickle for use where it seems most applicable.

The other demands that the perception of exclusive capital be created through vertical intergration with propritary IP and that the promise of cost reductions are underway. Aka Microslop trying to add a buzz word to every IP (percieved capital creation) and promising massive layoffs.

Nice

Because IF it is superuseful tool and you are being paid to dev then you will have to explain why. Like if a framer showed up to a construction site and refused to use power tools

One of these days lol

Instead of wasting money on children in need he can pay me to do the protests we do for free now

The better setup generate “semantic embeddings” that try to map how data stored relate to each other (by mapping how to it related within in its own weights and biases). That and knowledge graph look ups in which the links between different articles of data are evaluated in the same way.

The very expensive LLM portion really do just give rough aproximations of information language in that setup

Most of us have to learn things and are not all knowing beings

Poor SLES not being on the board with Redhat, and ubuntu.

Honestly zfs, btrfs, and lvm really do this so well i forget that traditional partitions exists

There was a guy at defcon that encouragef people to hack his pacemakers bluetooth

Huh, yeah. 50% cost in tokens could be 1 very expensive token or 1 million tokens. Who knows?

Im.very into “AsCode” and pretty comfortable with vi bindings. So the two extremes where i document (random notes with no structure needed and formally verified documentation ) it works for me.

I can preview the markdown, use vale rules to enforce style and vocab, do mermaid.js diagrams, link my UML to stuff, etc.

Then check into git to do version control or just to save it off local.

The silence of two hours ago lol

Chill brother. Like i get it, and FOSS advocates should lead with meaningful alternitives first imho, but there definitly seems to be some https://joplinapp.org/

I personally prefer vscodium and nvim myself for notes but that isnt a one for one comparison to obsidian (in either direction) imho

https://joplinapp.org/

Seems interesting

Im a VSCodium kind of guy myself

SUSE just one down from RedHat