• 2 Posts
  • 152 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: March 31st, 2025

help-circle





  • It’s up for you to decide. On U/VHF you can talk to other people directly (locally) like on HF. But you can also do things that HF can’t provide, or provides with limitations, like talk through repeater (uncommon on HF), or to ISS, or through satellites (HF bounces from ionosphere) or do longer distance communications from mountaintops, or do image transmission or packet radio (HF has less bandwidth). On receive only you can also download NOAA weather satellite images, or whatever else data are emitted by them. You can make your own repeater from two baofengs. HF gets affected by space weather, U/VHF is not, and we’re entering solar minimum. 6m will take you far further than 2m but it’s usually bundled with HF radios

    On higher end there’s also moonbounce, but it’s not in the budget category

    e: there’s 50 things you can do with SDR only (many on U/VHF) https://blinry.org/50-things-with-sdr/






  • waaaaay less impressive when you take a look inside

    Once Evo got familiar with the genomes of Phi X-174 and its kin, the researchers prompted the model to write new versions of its own. Evo generated 700,000 potential versions; the scientists pursued only the ones that looked as if they had the best odds of succeeding.

    They ended up making DNA molecules from 285 of Evo’s suggested sequences. […] All told, they discovered that 16 of Evo’s genomes produced viable new viruses.

    Dr. Crook cautioned that Evo’s viruses were not radically new creations. They tend to be very similar to natural species, relying on the same underlying biology.

    look out for breathless boosters “warning” everyone that ai will kill us all and it’s definitely not used as a marketing strategy







  • If we consider groundplane antenna, which should be much better than anything that you can fit on a HT, it might be centered on 145MHz (region 2 band) and it’ll be good for 10MHz for 1:1.5 SWR (140-150) and 17MHz for 1:2 SWR (136.5-153.5) according to some random measurement, first that i found. Outside of these ranges SWR rises rapidly and if you tried to transmit on say 170MHz you might get SWR 1:5, perhaps 1:10 or worse if you’re unlucky. On receive this doesn’t matter too much because these nano- to microwatts of rx power would just bounce back harmlessly with the only effect being that apparent signal strength is lower. But if you tried to transmit then design currents or voltages would be exceeded and something will break, usually final stage of amplifier. This gets rarer than it used to be because some radios can measure SWR and will reduce power in such scenario. This also gets worse the higher transmitted power is

    This happens because unlike on HF + 6m, on 2m and up ATUs are not a thing* and all antennas are expected to be matched. So you can use the same radio on GMRS or PMR or what have you and on 2m or 70cm band, but you have to change antennas between these uses. If you want to use all of these on one antenna, then there are special wideband designs like LPDA but this makes sense on a mast and not on handheld radio

    * there are tuner designs that work on 2m and up, but you won’t find them in HT, there’s no point, they’re too big, too heavy and too expensive

    Even if you tried and made it to work, there might be other incredible problems with things like harmonics or other spurious emissions because filters were not designed to work way out of these frequencies. For example you can try to force Quansheng UV-5K (?) to transmit on 60-ish MHz but most of the power goes out at 2nd and 3rd harmonic, because of the way filters were set up. Narrowband designs are much easier and this is what you’ll see all the time in amateur radio. Wideband and ultrawideband designs are constant source of job security for RF/microwave engineers

    You can think of matching units and antennas (and to some degree even feedlines) as filters to some degree, because their bandwidth is not infinite




  • mods of a comm that has “fuck tankies” in tagline have a vote and agree to remove a tankie mod. there are receipts and entire post prepared in advance

    at the same time said mod is removed as admin of a couple of matrix rooms. said mod is also db0 admin and seems to like leftist unity as long as it’s done her way only. three hours later she wakes up and her next move is to grab another, completely unrelated community and to move instances from blahaj to db0, a community where she was inactive as a mod for months, specifically so that it would be exposed to hexbear. we all know it works very well. it seems like this move was talked about with db0 admins but not other mods of said community.

    this doesn’t go as intended, blahaj admin steps in and removes that mod from there too. the new community on db0 is also removed, which is something that can be only done by admin, presumably some other db0 admin. then said mod makes second big post, calls blahaj admin a reactionary, steps down as a db0 admin (“voluntarily”, somehow i doubt that), moves shop to hexbear (?)