• 1 Post
  • 31 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: May 5th, 2026

help-circle


  • They don’t care how well you make the distinction. They will give the money to Zionist organisations anyway by abusing conflating Zionism and Judaism to pump up antisemitism numbers and then turn it into a weapon to support Israel.

    In case of the OOP it doesn’t refer to individual Jews but to Judaism as a religion where Zionism has become core doctrine over the last century. Of course most people don’t know this because there #ZionismIsNotJudaism signs are constantly shoved into their face and acknowledging the reality quickly gets you met with accusations of being an “antisemite” even here on Lemmy by all the Liberal Zionists. 99% of Jewish Organisations Worldwide are Zionist

    Governments such as in the UK and Zohran Mamdani in the US can then give millions of dollars to “combat antisemitism” to Zionist organisations which will then use this funding to fight anyone opposing Israel. Zohran just came out and said he basically wasn’t able to find any non-Zionist Jewish organisations to give the money to and therefore gave it to Zionists. But apparently he’s not “antisemitic” for this because he’s the favourite DSA poster boy.

    And the reason why is because people are refusing to address the crux of the issue that there is “rising anitsemitism” when in reality there just isn’t. Jews aren’t facing any type of systemic discrimination and are just very privileged white people. There’s no reason to do massive PR campaigns for Judaism all the time. Focus on Palestinians instead which are literally getting genocided.


















  • I really thought I linked the original study but if I didn’t then my bad though I can’t check well since my other account is gone and navigating deleted comments is too clunky for me so I’ll just concede this one.

    As or the rest I’m using the MEE article I trust them to have better read the report but they are putting lines in quote marks so I assume they did I’ll quote relevant article lines below

    No? It was self-reported.

    “The Bell review used the IHRA definition of antisemitism, according to its published terms of reference.”

    I think you mean 60%?

    Yes my bad typo

    “Of the 92 Jewish students, 70 of them responded to a question about whether they have personally experienced or witnessed antisemitism. Twenty-nine Jewish students said they had experienced antisemitism, which equalled 41 percent of the Jewish respondents, not three in five, which would be 60 percent.”