I do a little bit of everything. Programming, computer systems hardware, networking, writing, traditional art, digital art (not AI), music production, whittling, 3d modeling and printing, cooking and baking, camping and hiking, knitting and sewing, and target shooting. There is probably more.

  • 8 Posts
  • 207 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 4th, 2023

help-circle

  • I need to be able to “RDP” into remote machines

    Remmina, do this every day for work from my Debian system.

    I also need to be able to setup a Hyper-V equivalent, to run other machines from my main laptop

    Virtual box or QEMU + KVM. I use QEMU + KVM, works really well.

    And for my media server (Plex), I need to understand the best way to setup a RAID5 or better across multiple drives.

    Recommend Jellyfin over Plex but in either case - if you want software RAID then use mdadm, this is how the RAID5 array on my jellyfin server works. Otherwise, there are compatible drivers for some hardware with actual hardware RAID5 arrays you can look up if you have such hardware.

    For reference, all my machines whether client or server run either Debian 12 or Debian 13.


  • Most people’s reasons in my experience demonstrate to me that they have a perception of Linux as it was 15+ years ago.

    I discussed switching to Linux with a group of friends in a voice chat some time ago, most were fairly open to it, and one or two have switched since, but mainly their reasons were time constraints, not wanting to go through the process of backing up files, and finding alternative software.

    One guy in particular brought up gaming, MS office, and some other particular software they used. I showed them protondb and every game they looked up was gold or higher, showed them libre office which they could not complain about since it generally works a lot nicer, and it turned out that other software was available as a .deb. After all of this, the reason they gave me was “but I like Windows”.

    Fair enough I guess, though they couldn’t really produce the reason as to why.

    Generally, people just don’t like any kind of change, even if it has the potential to make them a lot happier.







  • golden_zealot@lemmy.mltocats@lemmy.worldClose
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    Is English your first language?

    No, it is not in fact? I didn’t know I had to submit my “I have spoken english since birth” certificate to you in order to have an opinion.

    I’m going to go ahead and block you now, because if you aren’t an open racist, you aren’t far off.


  • golden_zealot@lemmy.mltocats@lemmy.worldClose
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    I felt like more than the theme was common. The first panel and second panel are quite similar in that that both use “puke” as their term of choice over vomit, throw-up, hurl, spew, etc. In the first panel, both cats are stationary and making their statement about needing to puke. In the second panel, both cats are in motion while making a statement about needing to be in motion.

    In the final panel of this comic and the final 2 of the one I linked, both cat’s make a statement of relief of having “made it” in time to throw up. The joke is the same, and is delivered almost identically, except the other comic delivers it better by splitting the last pane up into 2 in order to reveal the location.

    The largest difference I see here is that the comic in this thread cuts out the additional work of having 3 extra panels without the text.

    The theme, choice of words, and when those words are spoken in these comics align.

    Furthermore, this has nothing to do with myself, I have no idea why you would say “get over yourself” when I am not talking about me. I can only assume you chose to say that to be intentionally inflammatory.

    If you are that offended by me seeing more similarities between two comics than yourself, then I have no idea what to tell you.





  • That’s true, the problem with the original statement is that it is too broadly scoped by “knowledge”, implying that it is any and all knowledge. If I obtain the knowledge to write a singleton in object oriented programming while at work - even if the concept is applied to a work project, and later use the programming concept of a singleton in my own software, then they can’t do shit.

    A simpler example that shows that it’s too broadly scoped is that if I get trained and certified to use a forklift for a job, and later start my own company and have to use a forklift, there is no precedent for my original employer to come after me for using a forklift in my business operation just because I learned how to use a forklift while I worked for them.

    If the knowledge is proprietary or copyrighted or a trade secret and what I do uses any of that, or what I produce is a 1 to 1 product of that, then they can come after me.


  • This is kind of how VeraCrypts hidden partition feature works.

    You start the process of the volume’s encryption and set a “false” password for it. It creates a partition that is encrypted with that password. When it finishes, you mount it and store “fake” files, the files you would reveal under duress. Veracrypt then takes in a second password and creates a “hidden partition” in the remaining free space of the disk - to be clear, that memory space still reports as unused/free if investigated, but the partition is there.

    You can then mount that with your second password and store your actual files. You can work with files and folders in the hidden partition as needed, however if anything is added or changed etc in that first fake partition, the data in the hidden partition will be corrupted by those actions.

    This means that so long as you plan ahead, someone can literally put a gun to your head and demand the password to the encrypted disk, and you can give them one that works without revealing the data to them.

    In theory, since the data in the hidden partition is encrypted and unreadable, it is impossible to detect that it exists in the “unused” space of the disk, even by a forensic analyst. To them it would just look like old, randomly flipped bits that came from previous usage followed by a quick format.

    Now, what’s really cool about this is that if you use the veracrypt bootloader, you can store and boot from an undetectable OS you store in that hidden partition, while having a decoy operating system on the visible partition:

    https://veracrypt.io/en/VeraCrypt Hidden Operating System.html


  • golden_zealot@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlAntiviruses?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Oh for sure - I think that this method has more efficacy in production environments ran by small businesses anyway, since best practices are rarely followed in many of them (until something happens that changes their mind on what they budget for haha), and even at that it is still a rare attack to see.

    I am unaware of this type of attack ever occurring on a persons personal network, most likely because so few end users make backups, there is no need to go through the trouble of doing this, making this method useful only in highly targeted attacks.

    We are definitely in agreement on proper backups still being the best method to recover from the vast majority of problems - even this one, depending on the backup solution.


  • golden_zealot@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlAntiviruses?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    They usually embed themselves in within the system files and have some scheduled job that basically checks for the criteria - if you are only backing up and restoring user data then it’s a non-issue, but if you do a full recovery including the system files/the system scheduler etc, then it can happen, and it is often necessary to backup executable and system files for production environments (true, not so much for individual users and their systems).

    When I was working in an IT shop, one of our clients was ransomwared with this method. The saving grace for us in that instance is that our backups were going to a product that allowed you to easily break open and dissect the compressed backups pre-recovery, so we were able to determine where the malicious files were and kill them before pushing the backups. Of course we only noticed that it was in the backups after we had tried to push the backups once already, so it was quite the timely process - I think I worked for something like 18 hours that day.

    You can read about such malware if you search for “timebomb malware” or “malware does not execute until date” etc.

    The attack is not super common anymore, but still happens.

    For example, here is an article discussing time bomb methods on linkedin.

    https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/time-bombs-malware-delayed-execution-any-run

    Another on the knowbe4 blog:

    https://blog.knowbe4.com/ransomware-can-destroy-backups-in-four-ways


  • golden_zealot@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlAntiviruses?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    There are viruses that are time-bombs. They specifically don’t do really do anything until some criteria is met in the future, such as the current date being beyond a specific date, at which point they proc. They do this in order to make sure they are in your backups when you restore them so that they immediately run when recovery is completed and the system is booted.