The counterpoint is that if you indicate at a point when it’s unsafe to change lanes to communicate your intention to, for example change lane after a car passes, then the other car might think you missed them and therefore might take potentially risky corrective actions.
Personally I indicate when it’s safe, but don’t aggressively change lanes right away, waiting a few seconds. Seems like a good approach to me.
I’m not in Germany, but I was taught (in mandated driving school) that when switching lanes, first check it’s safe (which means you cannot cause another car needing to brake for you), then signal, then change lane. You shouldn’t “request to” change lanes forcing another to need to react. Not sure if it can explain the behaviour.
But this is only for changing lanes, not for zipper merging, or just turning a corner etc.
Wouldn’t the private space functionality work for that?
Or create full separate user profile, although thay is much less convenient.
They also make great projectors.
On the TV side, they sold 51% to Chinese TCL, so I expect things will start going downhill fast from here, which is a shame.
The number of partners is in the cookie banner from onetrust when opening the site (maybe location dependent?). I’m aware it doesn’t mean they necessarily are making 3rd party http requests (feels likely though?), but when a site has such a ridiculous amount of partners, it is a huge red flag.
But it’s not surprising, if they donate to charity, for each search request, they have to generate income somehow…
We and our 1011 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device.
Seems like they would many more 3rd party requests than those four.
The work done by the hardware dept to build CPUs has been a great achievement though. While this started under Jobs, Apple now arguably makes the best CPUs in the market. Competing with AMD/Intel is no easy feat.
Where are people moving to from Vimeo?
For Qobuz there is an unofficial native client, with DAC passthrough: https://github.com/vicrodh/qbz
Works very well.
Meanwhile I found rethink dns. It’s a DNS based blocking that also use the local VPN similar to tracker control, however you can add any wireguard VPN to use inside rethink dns. This allows one to use any VPN provider that supports wireguard.
The UI is not as good as tracker control for what you want, but it’s possible to show logs of blocked request for each app.
Many VPNs provide blocking of trackers but you won’t be able to see the kinda statistics tracker control gives you.
Alternatively you could self-host something like pi-hole which will give you overall statistics about what is being blocked on a device level, but you still wouldn’t get information on a per app basis
Interesting, that is directly illegal afaik in many EU countries, where the rule is you must keep as far right as possible at all times. I.e use only left lanes when overtaking.
Interesting. Nextcloud does feel pretty sluggish and probably in need of a major overhaul of the backend. Still, it works quite well .
Interesting. Nextcloud does feel pretty sluggish and probably in need of a major overhaul of the backend. Still, it works quite well .
Does it bring any advantage over using GDB/LLDB? Seems a little unnecessary if it’s just to change variables.
Once per week for me. Works really great on openSUSE MicroOS. Had to roll back maybe a couple of times the last few years.
That said, I run basically everything in containers so the OS installed things are lean.
Looks impressive, especially with the amount of providers supported.
This is from 2023, but this might still be a good read on how to get to a very low watt idle build, there’s a few more post on other older builds on that blog as well: https://mattgadient.com/7-watts-idle-on-intel-12th-13th-gen-the-foundation-for-building-a-low-power-server-nas/
None basically. There’s a Sony phone has LineageOS (including +microg variant) support, but it’s not ideal either.
There’s an ongoing case about duress pin use
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/23/cop-city-protester-phone