حمید پیام عباسی

he/him

I’d rather be outside right now

Vegan btw

  • 194 Posts
  • 511 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 24th, 2025

help-circle





















  • حمید پیام عباسی@crazypeople.onlineOPtoMemes@lemmy.mlRed Rosa
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    I think the point is that the points made above came back to bite her, by getting shot in the head and dumped in the river for people who sold out leftism and opened the door for Hitler.

    In terms of Bernie, it is pretty valid. All the “democrat socialists” in the US become the representitive of bourgeois government because the US is a bourgeois settler colonial dictatorship. The white “working class” in the US have no revolutionary potential because the white “working class” are petit bourgeois settlers, no different from Israelis, and not part of the global proletariat, they exploit our labor and will continue to do so until it no longer materially benefits them and that doesn’t seem to be coming any time soon. They will sell us all out to save 10 cents on gas and prop their petrostate. readsettlers.org

    Death to the USA.









  • If the company puts up a sign notifying that there are cameras on the premises then under Article 6.1(f) https://gdpr-info.eu/art-6-gdpr/ it is allowed due to “legitimate interest” in deterring crime, securing premises, promoting general safety. This could be argued in a court that it fails the balancing test and that they could and should use more narrow means of collection but the way the courts have ruled I don’t think you’d win that case. Although to be fair the EU doesn’t use common law or case law for decisions so it could be up to the particular judge.

    Going back to the article though, if a person with the glasses is filming for “purely personal or household activity,” the entire GDPR is exempt under Article 2(2)© https://gdpr-info.eu/art-2-gdpr/

    GDPR regulates the data and the processing, not the act of filming or the expectation of privacy for an exempt usage. If they decide to sell this on a creeper site that is different but I wouldn’t look to GDPR to be the primary legal framework for this being explicitly illegal. The actions under original article would more directly be a violation of multiple other national laws like Germany’s “KunstURHG” and France’s “Droit à l’image”