Nobody is ignoring anything.
It’s not a license, it’s a policy.
AI tends to “discover” previously discovered vulnerabilities, or obvious vulnerabilities. It also tends to hallucinate vulnerabilities. I’m not saying it’s useless at discovering vulnerabilities, just that a human audit is better.
The policy also doesn’t say you can’t use AI to audit a code base, or even a single diff, so that point is moot.
It is literally a statistical next word predictor. Well, next token, to be extremely accurate. That is what it is in its most basic form. You give it text, it transforms that into tokens, and predicts the next token. You can then transform that back into words.
The model is the same size no matter how much it’s been trained. You can fine tune a model to predict certain kinds of tokens next, and you can distill a model to create a smaller model (basically training a small model on the output of a large model).
Lossy compression works in a fundamentally different way.
It would be even more accurate to call it a statistical next word predictor trained on human language.
I mean, near cost still wouldn’t be a good price, but there’s not a lot of advantage to sell it at a high price for them. Much less reason for anyone to buy into their VR ecosystem rather than Meta’s.
They did with the Steam Deck too. I don’t think Valve is worried about super-technical people. It’s if it’s easy enough for the everyday user to use it without Steam. The Machine is super easy to use without Steam, and it’s useful as a computer. A cluster of Frames wouldn’t be very useful.
At least that’s my take on it.
They might sell it near cost, since the only practical way to use it is through Steam. I understand why they didn’t do that with the Steam Machine, because that’s very easy to use without Steam.
A lot of it is very explicit definitions so there’s no ambiguity, and reasoning to explain why. None of the reasoning is quality of the code, which is what most people assume is the reason.
Maybe they’re talking about foviated streaming in particular?
It sounds like their policy is basically the same as Human Contribution Policy 2-TR. That’s awesome.
Yeah, that’s true. It’s on purpose:
Many services block addresses from anonymous email services, so we’ve made the conscious decision to not provide anonymous addresses on the
port87.comdomain. We do understand the value of maintaining your privacy through anonymous addresses, though, so we do not block anonymizing services, and we encourage you to use them with Port87 to enhance your online privacy.
- https://port87.help/#support-for-anonymized-email-services
If you have your own domain, Port87 supports that though. So you can use that without a shared username between your addresses. Basically the same concept as a catch-all through the other services you mentioned.
Yes and no. It essentially does the same thing, but makes it easier. You don’t have to set up anything beforehand. You use subaddressing by default, so you can give out an address like degen-channel5@port87.com, and it creates the “channel5” label for you when it gets an email addressed to it. It has per-label controls, so if you just don’t care about those emails, you can have them not send notifications and mark them as read.
I think anonaddy lets you use ad-hoc addresses like that too, but you can’t set it to mark them as read and no notifications, since anonaddy isn’t the actual email service.
This is pretty much exactly why I use Port87. Instant block for the Channel 5 label.
Wait, is Jim from The Office related to Jack Ryan? They look like they could be father and son.
The United States was the only country to vote against it.
Shameful.
You found clients?
That’s crazy. I had a really similar idea a while ago. Mine was trying to go buy some milk but you can’t stop shooting lasers everywhere you look. Glad somebody made it. :)
Is the horse made of knives, a knife itself, or merely a horse that wields knives? This matters.
What a disgusting human being. He should not have any power over anything, even a dog.
- The maintainer, probably