Omg, I absolutely love the idea of fuel exhaust that’s even more radioactive than it already is. I just love it so much I could die.
- 4 Posts
- 674 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: December 13th, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
I mean, look at the bright side. Someone scammed Logan Paul out of $635,000.
19·13 hours ago
Cats make the weirdest expressions when they stretch and yawn.
2·1 day agoSo, first, that’s definitely satire. Look at the names of things, like Definitely Real, Inc.
Second, I think open source will continue to thrive, we just need to ensure AI slop is avoided.
For my own projects (and anyone else’s if they’d like), I’ve written a very comprehensive human-only contribution policy:
https://sciactive.com/human-contribution-policy/
If projects adopt policies like these, we can safely guard open source projects from the slop.
46·1 day agoGood for him for catching up with the rest of us.
2·2 days agoWhat I meant with the runner analogy is that coding is a skill just like running. If you let a machine do it for you for long enough, you lose that skill.
I don’t think the dev of Lutris is an insane twat waffle. He and I just disagree on the use of AI code. I foresee the project’s quality declining because of it, and I’d prefer to jump ship now. Lutris wasn’t a big part of my system, so it was really easy. Basically I only ever used it to run WinSCP on Linux.
I just removed Lutris and tried out Bottles last night. How have I never tried it before? It’s so good!
2·4 days agoI said, in the issue, I was talking about the US.
More like, “why would I, an avid runner, who has trained in running for over a decade, run five blocks when I can just drive”.
That’s fucking bleak. Maybe this is the dev equivalent of AI psychosis. AI paralysis?
If all you do is prompt the AI, “hey, fix bugs in this repo,” then you had no creative input into what it produces. So that kind of code would not be copyrightable, 100%. You can fight it in court, but the Supreme Court refusing to hear it means the lower court’s decision is settled law, and your chances of winning are essentially zero.
Whether code where you hold its hand and basically pair program with it is copyrightable hasn’t been settled. Considering the dev said he does it both ways, the point is rather moot, since for sure, he doesn’t own the copyright to at least some of that AI generated code.
OpenClaw is an autonomous system just like the one in that article, and the dev said that’s what he’s using at least some of the time. It generates and commits code without human intervention.
That’s not how the dev said he’s generating code. He said sometimes he does it without any intervention at all.
Also, that’s potentially copyrightable. That hasn’t been settled.
As of March 2, it has been settled. AI generated works must have substantial human creative input in order to be copyrightable. Prompting the AI does not meet that requirement.
In other words, if the AI wrote the code, and you didn’t change it since then, it’s not yours at all. It’s public domain, no question.
Here’s my issue with this specifically. It makes Lutris very vulnerable to being considered entirely public domain:
It’s a sort of natural protection from snakes. They evolved that way to protect their ankles from the snake bites.
xD
Guess that all-in-on-AI attitude was not such a bold and brilliant idea after all.
Love it.
Not if it used Android, but if they ran like a Linux based OS, yeah, I’d give it a try.