Yes. You can just get by with 2 devices but you need to set expected_votes=1 in the cluster config somewhere, don’t recall where, and I’ve encountered issues with stability with that solution, seems like it’ll get undone though I haven’t used it for years to say if that’s still the case.

The q-device will work on anything Linux that’s available when the second node is down. Not having the tie-breaker isn’t the end of the world, it just means you have to go in after you bring up the second node and start some things manually, and if you’re replacing nodes in a 2-node cluster, it’s much nicer to have the q-device.

Proxmox uses a voting system to keep cluster integrity.

Check it out, it’s free and does a lot of things out of the box that take a lot of manual work otherwise. And the backup server is stellar. It does take a while to wrap your head around the whole way it does things, but it’s really powerful if you spend the time to deep dive it.

It works well. I have my docker hosts on HA as well because they’re almost as important as the router.

If you just use 2 nodes, you will need a q-device to make quorum if you have one of the nodes down. I have the tiebreaker running on my Proxmox Backup Server shitbox I3.

Proxmox is basically just debian with KVM and a better virt-manager. And it deals with ZFS natively so you can build zpools, which is pretty much necessary if you want snapshotting and replication, which are necessary for HA.

I run OPNsense on a 2 node proxmox server and have for a few years now. I have HA set up and have had it fail over gracefully when I’ve been away and not even noticed it having failed over for more than a week. If I want to upgrade it, I snapshot it, and if I upgrade the host I live migrate it, and I’ve done this all remotely more than a few times with no issues.

It takes some planning and I’d say you’d want a cluster (at least a pair of nodes) where you can do HA. But I wouldn’t do it any other way at this point. If you have only one port, you can VLAN it for using on both LAN and WAN.

Was it 4? I thought it came around for the 5 release. I think I switched DEs for almost the entire 4 debacle then switched back at 5 when it stopped sucking.

Edit: NM, I see I just missed it by skipping 4: https://dot.kde.org/2009/11/24/repositioning-kde-brand/

If you’d done a docker commit on your earlier changes, they’d have stuck as well.

The proper way to do this is to fork their image project and alter the nginx files that get incorporated in the build. Then you can run the stack with a build command instead of an image reference, and git pull your fork whenever there’s upstream merges. Or Action the fork to build an image for you every time it gets merged that you reference in your docker compose instead.

deleted by creator

This might be the last chance to migrate from Gitea to Forgejo and avoid whatever trainwreck Gitea is heading for. It’s going to a hardfork soon.

It’s all automated now, it’s pretty hard to mess up a standard install. It’s not like the good old days.

I’ve used Joplin for years. IDK why people have a hate on for it, it’s fine.

KDE Connect doesn’t do this that I’ve ever seen, and I"ve used it in Wayland for years.

If you’re the type of person (like me) that can name at most 4 colors, then you don’t care.

I guess on the rare occasions you need to specify the driver, this is the answer. Otherwise, it’s a lot of extra work for no real benefit.

I like having everything to do with a container in one folder, so I use ./ the bind mounts. Then I don’t have to go hunting all over hells half acre for the various mounts that docker makes. If I backup/restore a folder, I know I have everything to do with that stack right there.

That was heel skin. Way less disgusting.

I posted exactly the same thing a short while ago

https://lemmy.world/post/23955013

I found I had to set both of those items or it didn’t entirely go away.

For just an AP, I’ve used a number of the GL-AR300 and they’ve been fine as AP and repeaters, but only 2.4 GHz. I have no interference issues where I am so that’s fine for me, but if you’re somewhere populated, YMMV.

They also have the full firewall/router set on them, but I generally don’t use them for that.

+1 for using Activities. There’s dozens of us!

Might be easiest to just find a mail host that supports push notifications and keep using the mail client that works for you. Unfortunately, I don’t see how you’re getting a webmail client with multiple mailboxes without hosting that yourself with something like Snappymail. Maybe someone offers a paid and hosted Snappymail.

I host my own mailcow server and enable notifications for mailboxes I want to get notified for via Pushover. I have Snappymail in the stack, but rarely use it because I like K9 on mobile better.