

Problem with FOSS movement happened is not all parts are self sustainable. Which leads to market fit revenue system which is basically selling data as of now. Hope this changes in future.


Problem with FOSS movement happened is not all parts are self sustainable. Which leads to market fit revenue system which is basically selling data as of now. Hope this changes in future.


Probably Nextcloud


LinuxMint’s cinnamon is there
Thanks for correcting


Please suggest how it can be more scary. I was thinking about adding compulsory steps/procedure/documentation for reproductible builds of binary/binaries alongside source code !?
OpenSUSE Aeon


Can this be circumvated saying it’s distribution rather than OS ? 🤠


But I use ai to write everything online 😀 how will they identify then? 😂


This is exactly why some of us prefer the sanity of NetBSD. Besides monoculture is bad for anything.
I like LinuxMint’s MATE theme rather than default one of gnome2


License’s focus is not vibe coding devs but in general FOSS devs but current GPL licenses doesn’t protect them from A.I. scrapping their work. This one I wish will protect their works against non FOSS LLM/A.I. models leeching their work.


Being too restrictive is international. Also I think if organisation using internally it’s difficult to enforce this specific term but it will keep them away of they are not intentional about releasing source code.


Looking forward to comment.


Yes but most people want this services easily available which mobile apps alternative not available so they go for these.
Graphene coming with OEM phones other than pixel so it will solve those issues
deleted by creator
What about Android? What’s alternative?
Or OpenSUSE kalpa