knightly the Sneptaur

Uncoated stainless steel can be non-stick if you use it right.

Of course, some of the best single-purpose applications are command-line tools.

FFMPEG or YT-DLP for examples.

I want to hack one of these machines so I can dial in a precise and repeatable mix. =3

SSL expiration monitoring scripts.

Then go back to Reddit.

Point to a decentralized country.

If you could get that crypto nonsense out of my Weird Guy tier and down with the Outcasts, then this would be more accurate. =3

I don’t see what could have been confusing about the tits on those skeeters.

Because if they don’t then I won’t use their chatbot.

how much more for the product/service would you be willing to pay for a human operator on the other side or conversely, how cheap would the non-human supported product/service have to be for you to choose it over the more expensive human supported option?

Better question, how much is a company willing to pay me to use an LLM instead of going to one of their competitors?

Because if the answer is insultingly small then I’m not patronizing them.

I’m deliberately vague about the form of this help because I think that trying to keep track of who owns what is actively harmful to human society and we should abolish private property entirely.

It won’t help the kleptos so much as it will limit the impact of their offenses to the personal scale rather than industrial or national scales.

And instead of getting them help with their kleptomania, we built an economy where the richest thieves control the world.

And don’t get me started on the its, theys, and etcetera. The weird ones are so cool~

Furry sysadmin here, also trans but not a girl =D

I suppose if there was a wine config that had an appropriate dosdevice setup for the boot sector then it’d be able to write to it, but wine doesn’t need to boot so I don’t think that would do anything.

The problem is Goodhart’s Law; “Every measure which becomes a target becomes a bad measure”. Implementing a verification system that depends on video evidence creates both an incentive to forge such videos and a set of labeled training data that grows more readily available as the system sees more use. The adversarial generative network is literally designed to evolve better scams in response to a similarly-evolving scam detector, there’s no computational way around the need to have people involved to make sure things are what they’re claimed to be.

Universal Basic Income would be a good start, but the fundamental problem is money as the primary organizing force of society.

Only a matter of time and they’re already good enough to fool the gullible.

Certificates like that can only guarantee that the work was published by someone who is the person they claim to be, it can’t verify how that content came to be in their possession.

Does anyone know of any proof of legitimacy projects that are gaining traction? I can imagine news orgs being the first to be hit by this problem. Are they working on anything?

In short, no. There’s no solution to this crisis of legitimacy and no way to validate that a work came from human hands that can’t be counterfeited. Short of a Butlerian Jihad, it won’t be going away either. I’m looking forward to the inevitable bubble pop that will kill the overinvestment in generative tech but the models will still be around even without big companies wasting billions to train new ones.

In short, it’s long past time to start treating every day like April Fools Day.

This is entirely doable, but you may need to do some manual network configuration.