What do you suppose her plan is after this?


Lol I legit thought
whoa a gel electrophoresis meme, I wonder if anyone recognises the sequence.
Yeah, maybe it’s because if they crane their neck upwards, their rump rises instead of their head
So you see how its front legs droop so much because they’re so heavy? This means its torso is tilted far forwards and so it can’t really lift its neck much more.


Yeah it’s really “throwing like a person that hasn’t been taught how to throw”


Mining?
Also, how did you spread your loop? Was it continuous or did you have splices? What gauge was it? Was it just lying on the ground?


He says that the data is not illegal to possess only illegal to sell, so it’s not CSAM. Also you don’t ever actually possess the data, you facilitate its sale though.


The data isn’t accessable. The device is listed for sale (including the HDD with data: I’d guess SSNs because it is not illegal to possess another persons SSN, only to fraudulently use it and to sell it etc). If someone managed to buy it (in one of the brief, sporadic windows we can expect it to be for sale) the artist would still have to physically send the device to them before the data was actually in their possession, but by pressing the button you are participating in the operation of an illegal marketplace.
It’s good art. And it’s a good illustration of why minimum sentencing is a bad idea.
That’s only the new testament god. The old testament god would do […]
Yeah and that’s the same god that’s also perfect and unchanging right?


I’m communicating by telegraph I can.
At any time


Isn’t it a probabilistic extrapolation? Isn’t that what a guess is?


Seeing the interview with the two Canadians after the match put me off of them so hard. I don’t want those guys representing me. The way they accused Sweden of only complaining because they were losing was gross. Like even if Canada wasn’t cheating clearly it was reasonable for Sweden to ask for scrutiny. It’s like classic victim blaming, so toxic.


Hoodoo? You do! Do what? Remind me of the babe!


I’m surprised P ended up that high, the amount of autotune in it sounds like AI speech synthesizer with articulation cranked all the way 11 where it just makes random weird sounds
59.1% AI-detection™ score
A small note: that I wasn’t trying to decide whether something was AI, I was trying to evaluate its creativity. So I actually thought A was real, but that it was extremely generic… I also suspected D was AI but trying to judge on creativity, I was unimpressed with the lyrics (not that creative) but I found the soundscape it created interesting. That’s a place where my (un)familiarity with the genre was a liability. I also found the pitch of “you” in “who are you” nrar the end to be creative, like in the wrong key but in a good way.
Also I only listened to each track once, then decided where to put it in the list. Like “top”, “bottom”, “near bottom but not worst”. And I placed them as I went. If I went through the list again I’d probably swap some but that would have taken way longer and I decided it was more important to be done. I probably should have done some spot checks at the end to make sure things ended up where I wanted.


IVQJHOUPLGCFDNERTSMBKA
Great work. A few thoughts re: methodology.
I’m very curious to see the results. Sorry I didn’t get to it sooner.


Fantastic, I’ll try to listen today


So I’m pretty ignorant of the top of the chart I’d be willing to be a guinea pig. Do you want to send me like 3 chart toppers and an AI song and I’ll see which one is most creative? Don’t tell me which is which.
Uncles aren’t in your blood line, but maybe he knows something about your Grandpa