

Of the US’s own capabilities?
If you’re here, there’s still hope for the internet
Don’t let it fall
Of the US’s own capabilities?
As well as banning research. Absurd overreach of government and it will accomplish the opposite of what it wants.
No cause I was already running regular (non-deepseek) qwen 14B, admittedly a heavily quantized and uncensored version, so I was just curious if it would be any better
I think you’re confusing the two. I’m talking about the regular qwen before it was finetuned by deep seek, not the regular deepseek
Have you compared it with the regular qwen? It was also very good
Might be the difference between FHE and regular HE. I don’t know a lot about this subject, but if HE was more practical, I’d expect to see it a lot more, outside of ML too.
The lemmy devs may have opinions, but they’ve never interfered with blahaj zone or anything
And this meme here is showing one of the reasons why
YouTube may have a feature to normalize audio, I remember reading something about it
I mean the physical system
How I feel after removing the system itself (it was all bloat) (I can now live a carefree life, free of computers)
Samsung supposedly uses it for tizen
Wdym cannot be touched?
Honestly, I’m just gonna stick to llamafile. I really don’t want to mess around with python. It also causes way more trouble than I anticipate
Will it actually save all that much?
Some instances will continue for a bit, but it’s probably a matter of time, or until invidious figures out another method
what the hell are you doing that you keep being banned from discord?
> sudo rm -rf /*
Remove-Item: A parameter cannot be found that matches parameter name 'rf'.
later unixtards
Phoronix comments are a special place on the internet. Don’t go there for a good discussion.
The main error is that Linux is not strictly speaking part of the GNU system—whose kernel is GNU Hurd. The version with Linux, we call “GNU/Linux.” It is OK to call it “GNU” when you want to be really short, but it is better to call it “GNU/Linux” so as to give Torvalds some credit.
We don’t use the term “corelibs,” and I am not sure what that would mean, but GNU is much more than the specific packages we developed for it. I set out in 1983 to develop an operating system, calling it GNU, and that job required developing whichever important packages we could not find elsewhere.