I think in order for this to work, you would need to make it so that the server admins cannot see the contents of the communication. It wouldn’t work with public content

At that point, you might be better off using something like Matrix or a similar encrypted chat option.

If the other party doesn’t want to communicate with you, then what are you trying to achieve?

I think I’m missing something from your premise. Who are you trying to connect to in this case?

It’s more likely that some unfortunate new user will run this command, than any LLM. Especially because commands like this would be the first to be added to an LLM harness’ regex blacklist.

If you’re hosting it yourself, you wouldn’t be at the mercy of anyone else. You would get full control over your communication experience, along with any consequences that come along with that.

A PhD is not a standard university degree. It’s a research apprenticeship that takes place over multiple years around a specific question/research group. Even if a particular school is better (by some magazine’s questionable ranking system), someone might choose to go to the “worse” school if the research of a particular supervisor is aligned with their background.

As per this article, our schools have identified that these particular students have backgrounds that are in line with the placements that they applied to, enough so that some of the students are fully funded so that they can come here and help push the work forward.

But I’m pretty sure you understand this already, and are choosing to sealion anyway. This explanation is for anyone else that comes across this thread. I’m applying a temporary ban so you can think about how you should speak about other human beings.

That’s not what the denial is about.

Despite two years of sustained pressure, Prime Minister Carney and Lena Metlege Diab, the minister responsible for student visas, remain unconcerned by the distress of these students. For many months, Diab’s spokespeople have claimed that applications for study visas can’t be processed without biometric testing. This is a ludicrous requirement given Israel’s total elimination of all relevant facilities in Gaza and past practices for Ukrainians, Afghanis and Syrians coming to Canada.

As for why your premise wouldn’t be grounds for a denial, by definition every immigrant petitions to be let into a country. You are picking and choosing when you see that as a request vs a protest.

Someone that is allowed in on their first request would have no reason to ask again. You can’t then point to their subsequent requests and say that they’re being “entitled” and “uncooperative”. Not to mention that these aren’t charity cases:

During his acclaimed Davos speech in January, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced that Canada would exercise what he called “principled and pragmatic” leadership on the world stage. Among his government’s pragmatic goals is attracting top international talent to Canadian universities. In keeping with this, Canada implemented an expedited 14-day processing period for PhD students seeking study visas and pledged $130 million (CAD) to assist “top international doctoral students and post-doctoral researchers [to] relocate to Canada.”

It is hard to square Canada’s enthusiasm for recruiting the world’s best and brightest with its stonewalling of some of Palestine’s most distinguished graduate students. Currently, 130 students from Gaza who have been accepted to study (and in many cases awarded full funding) in masters and PhD programs in Canada are in limbo. Some have been waiting nearly three years for a study visa.

Be better.

I was curious about what the tusk is even used for

https://oceanconservancy.org/blog/2019/03/08/exactly-narwhal-tusk/

There’s research that suggests the narwhal tusk is used primarily for hunting, but contrary to what you might be imagining, they don’t actually spear their food. In fact, there’s video evidence indicating that they instead give a quick and firm “tusk tap” to momentarily stun their prey (usually fish, shrimp or squid) and then quickly suck them up.

TIL that narwhal tusks are for smacking and not stabbing

The video link, although I haven’t watched it myself and didn’t find the timestamp: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OoTjLIN67Bw

Is this a certain type of rabbit or is it normal to shave them while leaving a moustache?

Hopefully they let you set it as the default. For example, Instagram technically has a chronological feed but you need to go through some menus first

To be fair, wikipedia does this too and I find it helpful. The problem is the color scheme

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkey

My friend managed to find a compatible eraser at some stationery store while travelling, but he couldn’t tell me exactly which one he went to. This was before we could just order everything online, The best part was that you could use up the eraser a little bit to get a snug fit, you can’t do that with the yolks.

I don’t know why more stores didn’t carry those erasers

Some context would have been helpful from OP. This is relevant to organizations operating on the fediverse

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autistici/Inventati

For example, here is a related organization based in the US that people may be familiar with

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riseup

Why is this marked nsfw 😄

This deserves another post

If someone wants a guide

https://fedecan.ca/en/guide/threadiverse/how-to-block

:(

It’s too big

Fair enough, some people prefer smaller phones

Too many stars

It’s overhyped? I didn’t know that, but good to know

Not enough aliens

?

Everything’s too far away

???

Oh

What is the justification for rolling disclosure? That seems like a very obvious problem for this kind of a report

The above methodological concerns, however, are amplified by a rhetorical concern, obscured by what one might call the CASE report’s “rolling disclosure” — an opaque process by which the report’s findings are slowly and partially revealed over time, rather than all at once. This complicates the ability for readers to scrutinize the report’s raw data, as well as its author’s interpretation of that data.

When the CASE report was first released on Aug. 5, it exclusively highlighted the experience of Zionist Jewish respondents, while making zero reference to the experience of those anti-Zionist students who participated in the survey.

In stark contrast, amongst anti-Zionist Jewish respondents, a whopping 92 per cent said their campuses were safe and inclusive for Jewish students. In the National Post column, the authors try to write off the anti-Zionist data as a “psychological or social” phenomenon rooted in “a desire for social acceptance.”

The reality seems much simpler: Zionist Jewish students conflate hostility towards Israel with hostility towards Jews, whereas anti-Zionist Jewish students do not.

Good to hear :)

Generally I’d agree, but I’m suspicious about this one because the original announcement doesn’t have that kind of wording.

It’s FOSS seems to have added marketing speak when reporting on the announcement, and the phrase “It’s not X, it’s Y” is a very common affectation with the current models