As a fan of both Fedora and KDE, I’d say there are better alternatives than Fedora KDE Spin.

I can never understand why they’d go for GNOME for their use case. Don’t they want to have it as light as possible? Probably could’ve gone with XFCE or MATE.

Realtek wifi is the bane of open source driver

I am a big fan of KDE in general, but I feel like on Fedora, GNOME is more polished. I’ve tried using KDE on Fedora and it felt like a second-class citizen. Sadly this also applies to Alma Linux.

I use KDE regularly on Debian and Gentoo. I also have tried it on Ubuntu, Arch, and Slackware. So I have some ideas on how good it could’ve been.

i knew i should’ve gone with roundpack instead :(

Who hate flatpak?

Pretty much the same way you do on Windows & Mac.

It takes a special kind to run and maintain a mail server. More so for doing it for such a long time.

Aeon

if it makes you feel better, that’s good for you.

Maybe KDE?

Also I find Debian documentations are pretty lackluster.

we all pity you.

Do people still use ed unironically outside of scripting context?

You should, that’s how you can make a name for yourself!

“An update can wreck your bootloader with no notice, but hey, that’s part of the fun!”

Now I know how the Hyprland community got so toxic.

No, I said OpenWRT is designed exactly for embedded, and the use case calls for anything but.

I don’t know… At this point might as well use something not designed for embedded. Debian comes to mind. Or Alpine if you want something more minimalist.

Why is it so hard to just daemonize???

Not me personally, but in one of my past project, my boss was running a bunch of “services” by leaving it on GNU screen terminal sessions and detaching from them.

Everytime I went in to debug something, I’d need to go thru a list of sessions, attach to one hoping that it’s the right one (sometimes they’d name 'em), then see the console output.