Chat GPT can work in perl. It has eaten the entire CPAN so had had a lot of examples

I don’t subscribe to tracking how long something has been worn. I wear the same shorts or jeans for days in summer and months in winter

I judge them on whether they still look and smell good

It’s a pun on ‘sys admin’

~ has many dot directories and files

3.5 I’m an anthropomorphic bat druid

It’s also fair. The fighter doesn’t need to be strong in real life to hit the monster. The rogue doesn’t need to be agile in real life to backstab. The barbarian doesn’t need to be tough IRL

But tests of int and wis and sometimes cha are so often aimed at the player not the character

That meme has lost a lot of pixels

If you were assessing a company you would give them your report at the end and leave. It’s their problem to fix it

When you can type at 70wpm you can only do that when you’re copying text or taking dictation, maybe at double speed. Detailed thought doesn’t come at even 20wpm

I learnt to touch type quickly, the only thing I type at that speed now is my passphrases

Lines added, lines deleted

The UX guy is the one I’m agreeing with

BG3 rules had circle of the moon druids be tanks. Likewise in 3.0, but 3.5 and 5.5 both broke wildshape for tanking unless you can take a shape with high dex or high natural armour, or you have high enough point buy or lucky enough rolls to have wis, con, dex

The are so few high level casters, people wouldn’t have seen a wildshape infiltration in generations. Maybe it’s on the radar in large cities but not out in that country

Looks like it did 1d4 (and rolled a 1) points of dex

Druids were considered too powerful (they’ve never seen a 3.0 druid I guess

Prusa still let’s me sneakernet the print file to it, it’ll do it over the LAN, but USB is faster. I’m the only one who uses it, but I’m pretty sure since they’re focused on user experience it wouldn’t be onerous

M5 needs the printer logged into their server, needs the user authenticated and has no USB slot

No alternate calendar could overcome the inertia of the current one, but that’s worse than most, it breaks the week cycle

What I know of the FOSS angel is that it is perfectly happy with all the FOSS editors

I try to ctrl+x ctrl+c in things that aren’t Emacs. Whichever you choose you eventually learn it well and it seems so easy that it’s hard to see what the advantage of an alternative might be good for

No one can argue against you as you know how to use the tool. Vi and Emacs are both perfectly capable editors, both have been used to make huge amounts of code. Both are great for updating configuration files, both beat the simple editors when it comes to syntex highlighting and encouraging correct updates

Nano is fine for editing, fine for working with configuration files. It only fails when you try to use it as a development editor