What the fuck is up with all these docker comments?
Check your binaries, might not be the right ones for your platform/ubuntu version
What the fuck is up with all these docker comments?
Check your binaries, might not be the right ones for your platform/ubuntu version
At the end of the day the performance of a performance oriented filesystem matters. Without performance, it’s just complexity
The two works can live harmoniously together in the same repo, therefore, not incompatible by one definition and the one that matters.
There’s already big organisations doing it and they haven’t had any issues
Keen to see how Canonical goes. There’s another one or two distros doing the same. Maybe everyone will wake up and realise they have been fighting over nothing
There’s no requirement for them to apply to the same file? There’s already blobs in the kernel the gpl doesn’t apply to the source of
Not true
The only condition is that CCDL and GPL don’t apply to the same file. Wifi works just fine and the source code isn’t GPL yet wifi drivers are in the kernel…
https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/2094/are-cddl-and-gpl-really-incompatible
Like this that states there is no issue https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/2094/are-cddl-and-gpl-really-incompatible
Cow is an excuse for writing performance, though the read is awful too currently
Improvement is nice to see, still not ready for prime time
Okay thanks for your comment?
Looks dead on arrival to me, so much complexity for “performance” but the filessystem is outclassed by everything else in existence. If there was any real performance from this complexity it could have cool niche use cases but this is very disappointing https://www.phoronix.com/review/bcachefs-linux-67/2
I’m all over ZFS and I am not aware of any unresolved “licence issues”. It’s like a decade old at this point
How do you define GPL compatible?
You’re misrepresenting L2ARC and it’s a silly comparison to claim to need TBs of L2ARC and then also say you’d copy the game to nvme just to play it on bcachefs. That’s what ARC does. RAM and SSD caching of the data in use with tiered heuristics.
Sounds like zfs with extra steps
Looks like mostly multicast addresses
Hahahaha classic. I’m on wireguard so I think it’s all UDP now? I imagine the same tuning as OpenVPN UDP?
Bingo, that’s the core issue. Big fat windows decrease operating efficiency at large scale and if most clients are nearbyish it’s unnecessary.
I’ve noticed PIA do a good job, maybe that’s your work at play!
If you have good internet it could make it significantly better
Tcp transfers are limited by the product of window size and latency, if I am in Australia with gigabit internet downloading from Europe then I could be limited at mere megabits with a single connection!
Or /home/me/drive