No, \* is being put as a hash of a password, originally precisely because that would mean no actual hash (over any input) ever matches it.

Ah. Thanks for the correction. The intro + where I originally learned this from made me overreact a bit, it seems.

Ah. Thanks for the correction. The intro + where I originally learned this from made me overreact a bit, it seems.

Ah. Thanks for the correction. The intro + where I originally learned this from made me overreact a bit, it seems.

Yeah fair, sorry about that. The intro + where I originally learned this from made me overreact a bit, it seems.

Ah. Thanks for the correction. The intro + where I originally learned this from made me overreact a bit, it seems.

Remember, password-auth off is the problematic setting.

NO! Exactly the opposite, that is the problem. Key-only is a prerequisite for this.

Edit: see also, the first thing that pops up under the link.

I was wrong, see below.

NO! Exactly the opposite, that is the problem. Key-only is a prerequisite for this.

Edit: see also, the first thing that pops up under the link.

I was wrong, see below.

It’s also not real. It’s legislative clickbait.

1. this is a joke of a law meant to generate headlines and nothing else; congrats on biting.

2. how dare you imply the GDPR is bad. It might just be the best consumer protection law ever put to paper, certainly in the digital space. It has massive positive impact on the privacy of EU citizens, and even beyond. All the shitty things associated with GDPR - namely, annoying cookie banners - are not mandated by GDPR, they are malicious compliance from companies furious they can no longer steal your data without telling you. And even then: incredibly small price to pay.

Jellyfin on the open internet is FINE.

“What would Janeway do?” is a great way to navigate through life.

I am not being sarcastic in the slightest.

Oh SHIT yes, I hadn’t even considered using this for my own purposes.

I mean, “nobody can be this stupid” might actually have protected them in the past… We’ll never know!

Yeah, similar here. We use Pareto Security (which is perfectly fine). I’m a bit worried though that some decision maker sees this and thinks "neat, now allachines can be managed via [whatever the Microsoft interface for that is called]

My personal desktop? Hahahahahaha nope

My work laptop? Nervously shuffles this article under the rug before the C-suite finds it

“Some practical notes”

Looks inside

Three slop in a trenchcoat

What? I explicitly do not believe you can “murder” an LLM, I’m saying that due to the way the technology actually works, that if someone genuinely believes an LLM is sentient or alive, then sending a message to it mist also mean it “dies” afterwards.

LLMs are obviously neither sentient nor alive (and therefore the concept of murder doesn’t even remotely apply).