That was my take. Yes, it could well have happened, but can we really trust what someone like that says?

My computer uses a dark mode theme so that white colored font would have stood out to me.

Not invented, siphoned off from those who can’t game the system like they can. That means you and me.

I’m referring to the alienation of people who browse all, see a thread, and make an innocent comment only to be savaged by a mob of angry types who sort by new comments and continually hit F5.

Lemmy has managed to survive in spite of the tankies that develop it. I guess federation works in the end.

There is also a penchant amongst some tech types to force their worldviews. Look at all the AI people, Zuckerberg, and so many other tech leaders.

what is infuriating about a historical study?

I generally feel that someone is a tankie when they become emotional about some topic that is not worth the emotion as if you thinking something slightly differently is a personal attack.

This is it. Skip all the setup screens and just use it

Probably cellular-based internet.

It has happened on here too lol. People like to take exception with many things.

People always assume that it is an anti-technology movement when it’s really an income-protection movement.

LOL this is a company that is headed for eventual disaster.

What’s truly amazing is that they do this sort of thing ONLY because other people want to protect the Earth. This is done specifically to spite others’ feelings.

People get mad at me when I say that anyone who is Catholic and disagrees with the Pope is an idiot.

So, as you can see, the Reverse Bayesian Transformation has resulted in a normalized distribution. While n = 3, this logistic regression clearly provides a value of 0.75. Therefore, we conclude that there is a statistically significant relationship between cat owners and people who never pay taxes.

Funny: I’m a doctoral student in a statistical program and I have thought, since I started, that you can’t really use AI to cheat at stats. They can’t even get the math right much of the time. I wouldn’t even want to imagine what an essay would look like.

ChatGPT is good for ensuring that you understand a concept or, perhaps, help setting up a table or a specific formula. Not so good at actually doing STAT homework, though. (Note: I’ve never tried to cheat, but have seen how bad some of the responses are.)

Note: I’m not talking about researchers or people who go through to the doctoral level.

I work at a prestigious university with a notable business school and manage large teams of students. I hire students from all over and in all sorts of different programs. In my experience, business students talk a good talk and have a good interview but then never actually want to do the work. They aren’t in it for the learning, the growing, the doing. They are in it for the networking and to stage themselves for future opportunities.

So: no shock whatsoever. I agree with your point.

LOL LOL you CANNOT cool something like that in space. The entire concept is flawed.

I’ve made fun of yahoo before and deeply offended people who still use it lol