This is appalling, but seems in line with their recent coverage. Has the NYT always been promoting far right viewpoints like this or is this a recent change in their editorial direction? They’ve also been burying and straight up ignoring Donald Trump stories this close to the election.
They no longer deserve their reputation as a top news source in any case.
Retailers lovedbeing able to charge ten cents per bag, now they get to triple that profit? (or a lot more). They arent going anywhere
Well I mean, kinda. He does regrets not doing more when he was in government (as he has become significantly more left leaning) But I still wouldn’t characterize Reich as doing nothing.
He did have major policy ideas that were stopped by Clinton’s economic advisors, as well as the federal reserve (controlled by conservative ghoul Alan Greenspan, who Clinton kept on). Reich’s initiatives and plans were effectively shuttered by the same ghouls who ended up ending Glass-Steagall, leading to the 2008 financial crisis and all manner of horrific economic consequences even today. So I would really attribute more blame to Clinton himself for not fighting the more conservative wings of his own administration (on health care reform, especially)
It’s a lot of work, give them time
Sure, blame Kamala courting republican voters, not the fact that way more Americans actually wanted to vote in a racist AF old man(which apparently they did)