

You want to be sure if the integrity of the binaries that are running. That needs a chain of trust from firmware to user space.
FLOSS virtualization hacker, occasional brewer


You want to be sure if the integrity of the binaries that are running. That needs a chain of trust from firmware to user space.


Kernel access isn’t needed if they use signed boot and can verify everything running is what it should be.
Ah yes, found the drop down. Thanks.
Weird, opening in Pipe Pipe it seems to be some sort of Arabic. I wonder if I’m getting some weird auto-dub?
Has this been dubbed into a different language?


Free software licenses generally don’t restrict what kind of study or what kind of changes you can make. A lot of licences explicitly say “for any purpose”. There are licences that add additional restrictions, for example restricting the field of use to non-military, but they are not free software licenses.
ETA: the question of where liability lies for infringing terms of a source license occur should a LLM model launder for example GPL code into a propriety code base is something that will have to be decided by the courts.


Freedom 1 of the four software freedoms is:
The freedom to study how the program works, and change it to make it do what you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.


You need adversarialy trained mud splats: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uB0gr7Fh6lY
I don’t think anyone will be shipping CHERI this year. However I suspect a lot of ideas from it will make it’s way into Arm and RISCV architecture enhancements.
When it comes to export controls and sanctioned entities it doesn’t really matter what Red Hat would like to do - they have to comply with the law in the jurisdictions they work in. Even if it was purely a community project individual contributors face a similar liability if based in those jurisdictions.
When it comes to sanction lists there is a fair amount of commonalty between the US and Europe. This is really something to complain to government about.


Imgur has been offline in the UK since the original investigation. Do they even want to be in the UK market?


There are a fair number of third party boards based on the RP2040/RP2050 silicon. Even esphome can target it even though it originally targeted the esp32.
The silicon itself is pretty nice although the original had done problems with deep sleep.


Are they as well supported? There are lots of SBCs out there but if they are only supported by vendor kernels and have no documentation then i’d rather pay the Pi premium.
ETA: that said for a lot of stuff microcontrollers are a much better bet.
They are pretty good at summarisation. If I want to catch up with a long review thread on a patch series I’ve just started looking at I occasionally ask Gemini to outline the development so far and the remaining issues.


Do they also insist on a CLA so they can relicense contributions?


What was wrong with working with Godot that made them want to fork?
I guess somewhere between 6 and 7…urm 6/7 👐 (and my kids say I don’t understand memes 😅).


I’ve heard of him from his contributions to Wheel of Time but I don’t think I’ve read any of his other stuff. He sounds quite prolific given this “universe” seems to encompas multiple series of books.


MI5 aren’t a law enforcement agency but a intelligence organisation. They do work with the police though.
The chain of trust will depend on the hardware. I would expect on a Steam Deck it would be Valve all the way. If it was Ubuntu it would be Microsoft then Canonical. I doubt any random distro would be acceptable to the games wanting to enforce anti cheat.