

That seems to be the current line of defense — no legal claims means the owner can delete what they want to delete
Rust dev, I enjoy reading and playing games, I also usually like to spend time with friends.
You can reach me on mastodon @sukhmel@mastodon.online or telegram @sukhmel@tg


That seems to be the current line of defense — no legal claims means the owner can delete what they want to delete


I expected it to be a jest, but they look serious. It might even not be too bad of a language in other circumstances
Sounds like fun!
— legal department
Their point was that Blizzard should’ve hired DotA devs to make it made by Blizzard


I don’t think so, albeit this is a possibility and should be considered
Their repositories are really something, and the commits seem to only happen in bursts, I expected them to do a few commits every day, instead it’s like 10 days a year with 1700+ commits total.
But I wouldn’t assume they are conventionally malicious, more like a paperclip storage optimiser


Only gambling on thermal noise is the real deal /½s


risks were calculated
@
but I am bad at math


You’re joking, but people drive under influence not because alcohol exists, but because they have issues with self-control and responsibility.
So you do prove a point while trying to oppose it, imo


Yeah, there are 10 types of people


So, you’re saying Valve should make RAM? I don’t think that would happen, but it would be an interesting thing to see unfold


To be honest, I didn’t read through, because of all the flourishing and humourous wordy descriptions.
It feels unbalanced and leaning towards comedy, but jokes were not supposed to become the only reason to read that, were they?


Until some bots start doing that to look like real persons


Edited map does not really create fear or disruption of critical infrastructure, and I’m not sure about panic either


I wonder if sometimes people undo false edits thinking that those are correct, thus making the map correct again


So, in addition to supporting their conscription, you’ve decided to speak for them.
I think, they were writing about people mangling the fuel maps.
Otherwise I’m not sure what are you getting at, everyone should shut up about the war because on the front line they have better things to do and not on the front like they have no right to talk, is it?


To be fair, this is what bothers me more than the supposedly non-existent benefits, because I’ve seen LLMs being useful as tools, but the impact on environment is not clearly communicated (I’d wager it’s because no one wants to admit that it’s enormous). For that reason I’m trying to use local LLM instead, and it is more limited in usefulness but that’s fine by me as it’s not the only tool I have


Charging you would create real revenue, which would violate our principles.
Great, also payment plans are very affordable
I assumed you want to make person unidentifiable, in which case tone and pitch changes will not erase enough of biometrics.
If you want to make it sound like someone specific, then it’s exactly what you said in the last line, you need to train your own spoofing models. Also you sound like you want to do something I can’t endorse, so it’s good that you don’t want to train a model