He / They

  • 10 Posts
  • 385 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 16th, 2023

help-circle
  • t3rmit3@beehaw.orgtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.ca•Psssst
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’m sure minimizing the concerns people have with the Democratic centrists by writing it off as the AIPAC-funded will-endorse-a-republican-if-a-Muslim-is-the-alternative ones just having “had a weird laugh” will totally make them see you as a worthwhile and trustworthy ally!






  • t3rmit3@beehaw.orgto196@lemmy.blahaj.zone•Rulehio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 days ago

    It used to be a fairly strong representation of the American Heartland; farming, manufacturing, mining, etc. Then manufacturing collapsed, the steel towns died, the jobs moved elsewhere, and it’s basically a very rundown shell of a state.

    And because of that, the people who still live there hate everyone else (especially ‘libruls’, who Fox News tells them are the ones responsible) and are miserable to be around (I have family there).



  • I don’t think the primary counterargument is tech progression, I think the primary counterargument is that decoherence as defined here, and tech debt in general, are usually a function of humans balancing work time vs deliverable demand (for coding), and making tradeoffs like those adhoc patches vs rebuilds-to-maintain-coherence… but that is not intrinsic to coding, and is much less relevant to an agent swarm who could feasibly decide that a full rebuild using the lessons gleaned about design, but without the actual code debt, is warranted and possible within a short time window.

    If a cyclical process of n iterative updates > rebuild back to coherence > n iterative updates > rebuild back to coherence etc is used, you could mitigate the exponential loss of coherence, provided you set some kind of baseline for what rebuilds produce.





  • You’ve grouped together a couple different classes of software, with different purposes.

    “Bossware”: this is the BS one, that is used for monitoring employees. Remote screenshots, activity times, application use clocks, etc. No one should ever put up with having this.

    MDM (Mobile device management): This is IT software for managing device settings across a fleet (used to mostly mean smartphones, but now it actually means laptops), like enabling disk encryption, enabling the firewall, installing software and security updates, etc. It is also what you use for e.g. remotely wiping devices (e.g. when they’re stolen). It doesn’t usually monitor user activity.

    EDR (endpoint detection and response): this is security software for detecting malicious activity, meaning malware or adversarial actors (I.e. hackers). It often also enforces security settings like USB disablement and software allow/blocklists. This is a 90% automated, and a device that’s not doing or having done to it anything malicious is just a green checkmark.

    I run our security team, and I tell people up front that I’m not interested in what employees are doing as long as it’s not destructive or dangerous. I don’t and wouldn’t deploy bossware. I ain’t a cop, and I won’t roleplay one for my employer.



  • Whether there is a legal issue depends entirely on 1) the jurisdiction of the app developer, and 2) the jurisdiction of any third party whose code they may be mis-attributing or misusing.

    What arguments can I use to make my point?

    Make the point to whom? The app store? None, and there should not be; you can’t and shouldn’t be able to initiate legal claims on someone else’s behalf. If you suspect that they are bundling OSS software against the license terms of that software, you should reach out to the OSS owners. They have the right and means to make a claim. Otherwise, as far as you know they could have an agreement with the devs (and more realistically and importantly, any claim of relief you make- including removal of the app- may not be what they want).

    Many people suspect that this developer is lying when they say they’re not using LLMs for development. Any way to disprove that claim based on the package archive?

    Not feasibly, unless they accidentally packaged a .claude file into it.


  • Yeah I feel this, but I don’t think it’s bad; I want new games to be such a high bar that it’s raised peoples’ expectations, because I get to play those games too. I can still go back and play FF8 and Nox and even Pax Imperia, but I don’t need kids to be able to appreciate those games, those are my nostalgia-bong hits. If they’re all clamoring for GTA6 graphics, it doesn’t detract from my old games.