

Mmm yeeees. Very distinguished.
Professional software engineer, musician, gamer, stoic, democratic socialist


Mmm yeeees. Very distinguished.


Only if you are reselling bitwarden. The client apps are still free for personal use.


If they’re not ok with bullying the LLMs, why are they OK with enslaving them?


I wonder though if they just told agents to literally reverse engineer Photoshop. As in, they were given access to Photoshop and able to interact with the UI and figure out every minute behavior. With a good testing strategy, I could see agents producing a decent quality product. That’s basically strip mining years of effort put in by humans.


If some stuff is trivial, then it is fast to do.
Unfortunately this is not true. That is why the word “boilerplate” exists.


Lemmy devs still haven’t figured this out.


You don’t need to. But it’s probably a good idea for the same reason as with BitTorrent.


Reading through the docs about it here, it sounds like it’s only an indexer, not a tracker.


Well fuck me. I mean I don’t think that’s an immediate issue for me but that does suck.
EDIT: Although if we’re being honest, has PIA been found doing anything shady in the 7 years since they were acquired?


Do people not recommend PIA anymore? I’ve used it for a long time and never had issues. Supports port forwarding. Audits have shown they don’t store activity logs, and they even run RAM-only servers.
EDIT: Just looked at AirVPN. It’s nice they don’t request any identifying info on signup.


I agree the transport layer is good and having anonymity in a different layer works. I think my main gripes with it today are:


I haven’t tried SoulSeek. What does it do better than Bittorrent?
EDIT: After playing around with SoulSeek, it seems pretty cool, although the amount of time it takes to scan your files on startup is laughably bad.


Public trackers never seem to have as good of releases or swarm health, except for the most popular content.


This shit will raise your cholesterol like nothing else.


So just browse piracy sites with Tor. Bittorrent clients might struggle to access blocked trackers, but the DHT can’t really be censored IIUC.
EDIT: It might even be possible to configure Bittorrent clients to use Tor specifically for communication with trackers (but not for the bulk P2P chunk transfers).
EDIT2: Not sure why I’m getting downvoted. Maybe the next person to downvote could reply and explain why.


They could also force ISPs to ban VPN IPs that don’t comply with their piracy blocking rules, regardless of whether they’re in the US.


Oh nice it has Lee Pace. I really like him in Foundation. I’ll give it a shot.


I do appreciate some of the philosophy of Hey, like cherishing the human-to-human section of your inbox. But it’s simply not worth the price tag. Also now that DHH has proudly proclaimed he does not read any of the code, I don’t think it’s even worth it for free, if I’m gambling with my data. I just self-host Stalwart and Bulwark.


Well now I kind of want to watch it.




I agree that we should be careful about how we use passkeys, but I don’t think “do not use them” is valid advice.
This article only convinces me that a company like Netflix could support passkeys in a non-restrictive form (unattested, copyable, etc) and then ratchet up restrictions slowly as adoption increases. But this is really the same game we play with all other dark patterns like price hikes, pay-to-still-watch-ads, user tracking, etc. The savvy will realize quickly that enshittification is happening, and they will seek alternatives.
To me, this is not adequate justification for boycotting the entire passkey technology. I find them convenient, and I use them in my own homelab identity provider. Only a handful of the services I use even support them properly yet, but I wish more did.