Your momma’s so fat, she got shot with a tranquilizer dart when the hippos escaped from the zoo.

We all know how good “just following orders” and “just doing my job” turns out.

“Far right feminists”

What?

Or idk maybe people have a job where it’s useful to hone your tools? This meme doesn’t make any sense.

RAM was the last thing on my mind when I switched to a tiling WM.

That’s why I quit coffee. Tea doesn’t do that to me for whatever reason, probably just less caffeine total.

But I assume it also had something to do with high blood pressure.

I thought part of the philosophy of solarpunk was finding ways to use technology in harmony with nature. That seemed like a big theme of Scavengers Reign to me.

Does Scavengers Reign count as solarpunk?

Same as demon. Because my research indicates that this usage was originally a reference to Maxwell’s demon.

https://www.takeourword.com/TOW146/page4.html

I thought it was a reference to Maxwell’s demon.

Daemons in computing, generally processes that run on servers to respond to users, are named for Maxwell’s demon.

Or if you have like $5/mo to spend on a VPS, self-host vaultwarden. It’s compatible with the bitwarden apps and browser plugins.

This is not a shitpost, this is absolute gold.

Haha this immediately reminded me of this scene from White Lotus Season 3

https://youtu.be/uOeiII8zQhg?t=130

I think you’re misunderstanding the incompleteness theorems.

Gödel’s incompleteness theorems also apply to universe and consciousness

Sure, if you assume the universe can be described by a computable formal system. Godel’s theorems apply only to computable formal systems.

To briefly summarize Gödel’s incompleteness theorems, it states that a formal system cannot describe everything.

That’s a gross oversimplification. It really says that (1) there are true statements about formal system S which cannot be proven within S and (2) S cannot prove its own consistency.

This means that a Turing Machine will never be able to simulate our universe or replicate consciousness, and thus to replicate a human brain.

You’ve previously assumed that the universe is a computable formal system. But all computable formal systems can be modeled as a Turing machine. This is a contradiction.

However, it could be feasible with Quantum Computer that are not based on formal system.

How would a quantum computer even work if it weren’t described by a formal system?

I have used OOP design patterns many times, but that doesn’t mean I use inheritance a lot. I almost always reach for interfaces instead.

It was actually typed. Python had type annotations at the time.

I only wrote C++ very early in my career so I don’t remember much, but I’m sure I at least tried some inheritance in toy games I would write. All of that code was trash though by my standards today.

Some legacy Python code that already used inheritance. I had to extend it, and it was pretty infeasible to refactor the whole thing to not use inheritance. Not sure if I technically regretted that decision, but it was definitely painful, since Python inheritance makes it really hard to follow program control flow.

No because those are different things.

In over ten years of professional programming, I have never used inheritance without regretting it.

I think they meant you could wipe with dd and then they are recyclable reusable.

EDIT: s/recycleable/reusable