I mean if they’re reading books in the first place you’re probably already in the clear

Phrasing!

On that we agree.

The left is realizing that. The problem is that the right isn’t.

I’m unsure how most of what you said relates to the parent comment. Did you forget to drink your coffee before commenting?

You: Cool! The entrance to the subway is around the corner.

Bob: Thanks for the help, friend!

You: You’re welcome! Good luck.

The cognitive ceiling. Research by Ericsson, Mark, and Newport shows that 3-4 hours is the daily maximum for concentrated effort. Beyond that, diminishing returns.

“Diminishing returns” is not the same as zero returns. You’ll get more coding done if you work eight hours a day than four hours a day. There’s certainly a point where the quality gets so low that the returns are negative (by introducing bugs / technical debt / stuff you have to rewrite the next day), but in my experience 4 hours is not it.

In fact, if the problem is very complicated then it might even take you three hours just to get up to speed with what you were doing the day before.

But the article is about what material is used as a conductor

Are you implying that gold isolates better from interference than copper?

That gives you one year to organize and practice.

deleted by creator

And then everyone clapped?

If that ever happens you’ll hate yourself for being so vain as to ignore chemistry and personality, and the relationship will likely crash fast.

According to Star Wars, Parsec is a measure of time not distance

0.3 what away from me? Miles? Kilometers? Meters? Units matter - I’m not driving to the other side of town just to pick up a bloody pizza.

Not by Joseph, but someone diddled her and he’s allegedly much older.

In UI jargon, “chrome” means the non-content UI that frames what you actually care about, by analogy to the decorative chrome trim on old cars: shiny, attention-grabbing “window dressing” around the “real” thing. Mozilla documentation from 1999 talks about “window chrome” as the browser’s UI framing.

Google named their browser “Chrome” as an ironic nod to minimizing UI chrome. So the name literally comes from the use of the metal chromium on cars.

In some ways yes, but this effect would appear with any kind of reinforcement learning whether it’s neural networks or just fuzzy logic. The goal is to promote certain behaviors and if it performs the behaviors that you promoted then the method works.

The problem is that, just like with KPI:s, promoting specific indicators too hard leads to suboptimal results.

Since when could you search for videos on Alta Vista?

The critical question now is: does dick taste like chicken?