Because in this case it’s relevant as they won’t have the organ in question

I drank the maximum for my weight and exertion that would just barely not cause water intoxication. Now, let me get a glass

Implicitly stating they’re doing something equally as bad twice a day

Jokes on you; this near the solstice the sky doesn’t get dark enough for me to see anything anyways

They called them “gross-ups” and I love them.

I say arithmetics

Her little hiccup I think was a joke about the alcohol content of the cough syrup.

Sorry, I’m bumping up against Poe’s Law with this comment so I think I’m misunderstanding your point.

I don’t own a subway, it’s not my organisation. I was just using my imagination to put myself in the shoes of others to understand their decisions.

Now then: You’re literally stating that having homeless people in a space causes social harm, and that making a place less hospitable for the homeless, even if it improves that place for its main function, is also a societal bad. Let’s accept that for the sake of argument. Why are the homeless camping in the subway? Doesn’t that mean they’ve already passed down from further up this displacement chain and the subway is also a victim of the same thing?

The subway and the homeless are both just dealing with their situations in the best ways they can. Asking the subway to house the homeless in their corridors is about as helpful as just telling those homeless people to stop being homeless.

So all passengers in any vehicle can’t use their phones? That’ll be wildly unpopular.

No, I was being a bit facetious in my response to the comment that the solution is housing the homeless, not making things less hospitable. It’s of course not within the Subway’s powers to actually solve homelessness so giving them flack for picking the less worse option with their limited options instead of magically solving the root of the problem is silly.

Get mad at the people who are actually responsible for dealing with the root cause, not the ones needing to make tough choices dealing with the reality of it.

I agree with you almost completely. The issue is if the homeless prevents the space from being suitable for disabled people or other commuters, then this is the “less worse” option from the subway’s perspective. The subway is focused on creating a safe and clean commuter environment; it’s not within their power to solve homelessness so they have little choice but to make everything a bit worse for everyone to stop the problem they’re dealing with from making it even worse yet for everyone.

You think the subway should house the homeless?

If the class doesn’t get nut on by a fish the filmmakers are cowards

Sure, but a tool shouldn’t care how you use it.

True, but we’re at the time of year when there’s way more daylight than night, so it’s a war of attrition with the hot day winning no matter what you do.

Do air fryers take that long to preheat?

Removed by mod

I’m peanut butter, you are jelly

You can put it in a water bladder and strap it to the sun visor. Now you have a handy straw and then it’s as simple as taking a sip whenever you feel your vision go unblurry

Shouldn’t it be a triple? Blatant false representation, a real blemish on the Bubble Butt cinematic universe.