I didn’t suggest he would run things, only share his expertise with peers.

It’s disappointing yet unsurprising to read the recurring answers, namely :

• cost
• incumbency

precisely because it’s absolutely avoidable and a well known strategy. It’s so well known that it’s precisely why Micro$lop bought Github in the first place. People are there and the free tiers is enough to get the long tail.

Meanwhile since that strategy happened people who consider smart enough should know the genuine cost behind this : it’s a TRAP. Plain and simple, you get there and you get STUCK there.

So… yes it takes some sweat and even some money to leave the trap … but if you care about freedom, as most free software or open-source developers might, then it’s aligned with your value.

Doubt it, most other online stores with the same coverage do offer similar conditions.

Right, like how Micro$lop :

• blocked repository search without login (while it worked before the acquisition)
• pushed in the most traditional Micro$lop fashion for its own product, e.g. Copilot, with in product ads
• use repositories as ways to feed its own set of products, e.g. Azure for OpenAI, in order to push for code generation while ignoring licenses

and all the other things (please feel free to make this list more comprehensive) as “reparations”?

It’s the same old "Embrace, extend, and extinguish " (EEE) scheme they’ve been (sadly successfully) running for decades now.

So happy with my 2nd hand Pixel 8. No BS, ecologically acceptable IMHO and yes runs most Android apps thanks to GrapheneOS.

Compared to CopyParty, been using it for few months now, does it also means no directory and no way to explore, namely dropping files more than organizing?

Hopefully he’ll contribute to GrapheneOS or F-Droid.

Agreed, it’s as if you would let the locksmith go through your mail, indefinitely, after they fixed your frontdoor.

Absolutely ridiculous, right? Well… not so much when your entire digital life goes through gatekeepers like Google, Apple or Microsoft.

You jest but it’s a thing https://cooldowns.dev/

That’s the worst part, their justification for more information to make one safer doesn’t even work. For-profit security theater.

what breaks the immersion

This isn’t a game, it’s about your freedom, our freedom.

If you want to use Brave to watch YouTube… well I don’t think you really care. The fact that somehow watching a video on a gaming rig isn’t fast enough so clearly not normal. That being said honestly it’s good you did try.

Artwork idea : load thermostat.

You can’t start a new application if your room is above a temperature threshold.

Extension artwork idea : load credits.

If you do delegate some load to a non digital form, e.g reading a paper book instead of watching a movie, then you “earn” some credits you might use to bypass the load thermostat “when you really need it”.

Measure your system, e.g. Zigbee thermometer for your actual room power draw so the plug for your entire system, computer obviously but also screen, speakers, etc even AirCo unit or physical fans if you have some for the room itself.

That’s the only way to know what is actually happening.

If you do not want to go down that path then the heuristic is simple : the heavier the load on either CPU, or GPU, or obviously both, the higher the temperature. If you have a dynamic system, anything built this last few decades or so, then the fans will not kick in under a threshold which you can consider won’t significantly heat up your room.

TL;DR: if you start to hear fans spinning, you have to reduce your load.

Sorry to be that guy but… why? The whole motivation behind PDF is precisely NOT to be edited, NOT to be responsive, but rather to provide the SAME output, mostly text based, anywhere and everywhere.

I’m not saying she shouldn’t edit PDF but I also have to clarify it is not "normal’.

I’ll refrain from recommending anything before actually understanding the motivation behind her workflow.

no defensive reason to allow inward facing cameras

So you don’t think me witnessing drivers falling asleep at the wheel is sufficient?

I clearly defined the context. You can argue for things outside of what I defined but then you’re not discussing about what I proposed. I can still repeat it in a simpler way at the risk of being condescending : if it’s misused, it’s bad. If it’s used properly for the reason I mention I do believe it’s good.

But that’s not the same power relationship. The usage I explained is about safety for yourself, passengers and people on the road and nearby. The usage for Amazon is about increasing productivity and send the data up the hierarchy. They are not the same usage with the same technology.

This has nothing to do with work though and the power relationship between a boss and their subordinates, does it?

To be clear, again, I’m not saying what Amazon does its workers, in trucks or not, is good. It’s not.

No idea what you are talking about. Are you saying a camera is like a gun?

I don’t know the purpose of this camera but sadly I have seen numerous driver battling against falling asleep, including on highways, so going faster than 100km/h on a 1ton machine.

You all might be excellent conscientious drivers who are horrified that the car might check on your ability to drive but I can tell you with 100% certainty that not all drivers, including otherwise very kind and caring people, are not always able to drive, yet still do so.

To be clear I am not advocating for any data to leave the car at any point. I’m only point that some usages of cameras pointing to the driver might be both beneficial to everybody and not be a privacy problem. How? Well detect the presence of eyes and if there is not, demand a conscious action (e.g. pressing a button) and if this does not work, increase stimulus, etc. This does NOT require any data from being sent to anybody.

Unrelated but I’m also for speed limiters for cars. I also do not think it’s a privacy issue.

Still, to clarify, safety MUST be improved WITHOUT hindering on privacy of anybody involved.