Perhaps it’s well and truly time to find a new service.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/shopify-ceo-endorses-idea-to-give-more-votes-to-wealthy-canadians-9.7286688

That’s quite the investigation.

If I’m understanding your description correctly, you appear to have found a bug in the design, but have you confirmed that the diagram and the actual circuit board are identical?

Here’s a story about the workers that this company spent 18 years fighting.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/aug/12/canadian-airline-westjet-settle-flight-attendants-sexual-harassment-class-action

Wow … that’s extremely disturbing and the fact that the airline dragged this out for 18 years and continues to operate tells you exactly what you need to know.

Looks to me that it’s high time for the passengers to seek alternative airlines to fly on.

In a word … Disgraceful.

The linked article does not match the headline.

I read all of it multiple times, before and after editing, and it’s clear to me that we’re failing to communicate.

Markdown and HTML are both examples of markup languages but that doesn’t mean that the words are interchangeable.

It is not possible under any circumstance to represent all that HTML supports within markdown.

Given that HTML supports significantly more formatting than markdown, it’s completely unsurprising that any conversion is imperfect, this is not a flaw in pandoc, it’s simply not possible.

I’ll also point out that I was suggesting that OP starts with markdown and converts that to a required output format using pandoc. The barrier to entry is significantly less than using LaTeX for example.

What are you talking about?

Write it in markdown, segment into separate files for different sections, use pandoc to generate the output.

That’s interesting. It does make me wonder … how does the Go community deal with malicious actors who “tweak” their “vendored” copy of a library, or am I missing something?

No worries, it’s 3am here right now 😁

I meant the users of your project.

This does appear to then break the chain of trust for the users of the project, since it then requires downstream to review even more code.

For example, if you’re an OSS user of three projects that each depend on library X, you now need to trust three copies of this library and make sure that they’re the same as the original.

This seems to be a solution that makes the problem bigger for everyone, not smaller.

So … using a dependency as a submodule?

I don’t understand the author’s description of forking vs. vendoring, the latter being a term I’ve never heard of.

Anyone got any links to something more descriptive?

On SOME ARM64 … but at least it’s a start.

What if it was supported on all hardware that Debian was supported on, that would be something worth getting excited about.

Whenever I see the word “OpenAI”, I substitute it with “my cat” and the world makes a little more sense.

For example:

‘Apple is getting this wrong,’ says my cat — startup blasts iPhone maker over lawsuit alleging it stole confidential information through ex-Apple employees

Also, AI with Assumed Intelligence and LLM with Unsupervised Text Extruders.

26 years ago.

https://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2000/09/msg00038.html

For the majority of the global population that’s a day late, we’re already dealing with Friday.