• 57 Posts
  • 394 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: April 2nd, 2025

help-circle
  • SCTP was going to do that too. It hasn’t seen much uptake.

    SCTP has a major obstacle in that the internet is full of middleboxes that will never support it, because it’s not TCP or UDP. QUIC deliberately addresses that by being plain old UDP. Routers, firewalls, etc. don’t have to know anything about it in order to handle it.


  • who@feddit.orgtoLinux Gaming@lemmy.worldlutris-minus-ai
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The way I use Lutris today is nothing more than a prefix manager, I click add game, set up my prefix, and install my games manually.

    New features will be unlikely, but not entirely off the table if there’s a really good reason to include them.

    Given this, wouldn’t simply bookmarking the last Lutris release that you find acceptable be an easier way to meet your needs?

    Or are you trying to guard against Lutris disappearing or retroactively changing old versions?







  • Interesting. This one looks more powerful than most attempts I’ve seen.

    One of my key questions is addressed in the FAQ:

    Hard link or symlink? What about a Mo2 style vfs?

    • They all achieve the same goal but each comes with downsides
    • Hard links can be loaded fast and take up no space, However when the source file is removed the hard link is removed which can cause issues. The hard linked file must also be on the same drive as the source file. They also look like normal files and report as taking up space which can cause confusion
    • Symlinks can be created between drives and are distinguishable from normal files. Removing the source file stops the symlink from working but the symlinked file still shows as a symlink and can be easily removed. The downside of these are they much worse than hard links when playing with large modlists as they take longer to load. The manager allows you to freely swap between both methods and symlinks may be fine for smaller modlists.
    • Mo2 style vfs (FUSE and overlayfs): These have the benefit of not moving any files to the game directory. I have added both of these to a test build, Neither provided any real benefit over hardlink/symlink and caused more issues than it was worth.

    https://github.com/ChrisDKN/Amethyst-Mod-Manager/wiki










  • In case you want to try some others:

    https://simplelogin.io/
    https://relay.firefox.com/
    https://www.33mail.com/
    https://erine.email/

    Unfortunately, some misguided (or possibly malicious) people collect email forwarding domains like these and publish them in lists dishonestly advertised as spam or disposable address lists. An unfortunate number of service developers have taken to using these lists, leading to the situation you’re in now.

    The best suggestions I can offer:

    • Complain to the administrators of each site that does this, making sure to explain why it’s a problem. There’s a chance that some of them honestly don’t realize that legitimate forwarding domains are being swept up into a dragnet intended for spammers, and might stop using those lists if they were made aware.
    • When choosing a forwarding service, pick one offering domain names that haven’t been picked up by the blacklists. This might require non-default settings when creating a forwarding address, or paying for access to the more obscure domains.

  • Thanks for posting this. I’ve been keeping MX Linux in the back of my mind as a possible Debian alternative if I ever need one.

    they aren’t letting me post this testimonial in the MX forum because it doesn’t accept anon-aliased emails for logins.

    Ouch. That’s a red flag for me, since it forces people to expose themselves to spam and tracking if they want to participate in the community. Which alias service did they reject? Maybe there’s one that doesn’t trigger their rule?


  • I mean, pretty much every desktop environment that’s not Gnome or KDE has been dragging its feet.

    To be fair, migrating a desktop environment from X11 to Wayland is a lot of work, Wayland still hasn’t reached feature parity, and most desktop environments are maintained by very few people with scant resources. It’s no surprise that the big ones are ahead of the others.



  • the Linux ecosystem that’s currently driving away developers in droves with fragmentation to consider that.

    I am very skeptical of this. Exactly which developers are being driven away “in droves” because of packaging system differences? If you want to make a case for that assertion, you’re going to have to identify them, so they can be counted.

    If it turns out that there are many developers who think like this, someone ought to let them know that they don’t have to package open-source software for every distro out there in order to reach all the major distros. Just package it for one, or even none, and let package maintainers do their thing.

    Or, are you talking about proprietary software? That would be a different discussion.