Also theft.

My car stereo has this problem. Its randomization always results in the same list. I have to trick it by doing something random myself first.

This friendzone is funnier than the OP.

By rarity.

They also want to make sure people with a different skill color do not have more babies than them.

I think that’s actually the main reason.

Advertise a service on some dark markets for cheap paid models.

Tor?

It’s always a clumsy experience for me. In some stores I just walk in, get a drink, scan, pay, and be out in less than a minute. But for my actual shopping? Way too much stuff on that little terminal thing.

The communication must be made in a manner in which another person may view it.

So she shouldn’t even get charged.

Facebook requires a public obituary before an account is put into the RIP mode.

Well it does look amazing even with the plywood, so I’m sure you’re competent.

That’s irrelevant. It’s the rule itself I don’t like.

Damn right I’ll give my game collection to my kid.

So if I die and I leave my harddrive full of offline installers to my kid, GOG will come delete every installer?

What if a 30 year old dies and their 10 year old kid can’t play the games anymore that they were playing by using family sharing?

Yeah you can.

But Steam doesn’t want it, according to a support rep:

Unfortunately, Steam accounts and games are non-transferable. Steam Support can’t provide someone else with access to the account or merge its contents with another account. I regret to inform you that your Steam account cannot be transferred via a will.

https://www.pcworld.com/article/2347640/steam-says-you-cant-leave-games-in-your-will-but-us-law-might-disagree.html

This means you can leave your login details in your will, but Steam can block the account. Also, in case the login details in your will are not correct anymore or no login details were shared, Steam will not give access.

I love it except for the plywood.

What I dislike about Steam is that Valve doesn’t allow you to leave your account to somebody else upon your death.

But I also acknowledge that some people struggle depending on their location, occupation, time, knowledge, access to groceries, budget (although plant foods/products are usually cheaper, not necessarily always), and individual health circumstances.

Let’s jump into it:

location

in North America and Europe it’s extremely easy, and those are the non vegans that often claim location issues.

occupation

This one is possible, but it’s perfectly doable with 40 hour work weeks like I did when switching.

time, knowledge

It only takes a while to get used to it. You need to learn where you can get your nutrition from, and learn some new recipes. This takes a few months and it can be learned during the change towards veganism.

access to groceries

Same as location.

budget

Like you said, most vegan products are actually cheaper than non vegan products.

individual health circumstances

This is almost always a lie by non vegans. I think the disease where you can only eat meat to get the required nutrients is like 1 in 100 000. Nut allergies are also not that important. I don’t really eat much nuts and I’m always perfectly fine on my yearly vitamin checkups.

There’s always a “more vegan” and “less vegan” way to live, so to speak. To argue that because we can’t avoid it entirely, then we have no obligation to reduce it as far as we can, is I think a nirvana fallacy.

That’s well said.

It will compel telecommunications providers to identify without a warrant whether individuals under reasonable suspicion of criminal activity are users of their services, and requires “electronic service providers” to assist in providing data to law enforcement when requested

Holy shit that bill’s awful.

The AI will determine there are a few generous people on the parking lot to whom you can beg for the money.