

I mean that’s basically the idea behind neurosymbolic AI, have the LLM deal with natural language input, convert it to a formal spec, and give it to a symbolic engine to execute https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.00813


CIA just can’t attract talent like they used to.


the one I highlighted in the body of the post 🤦


he posted this on his official account



So far, war crimes are still scheduled for tomorrow pending a TACO.


it’s always nice to get validated in your logic though :)
Ah yes, misinformation and propaganda as reported by mainstream western sources. Seeing chuds like you lose their shit really is rewarding ngl.
you keep on malding there kiddo, also why would you assume I’m Chinese? 🤣


kind of yeah, incidentally I experimented with a similar idea in a more restricted domain and it works pretty well https://lemmy.ml/post/41786590


Basically, the idea is to use a symbolic logic engine within a dynamic context created by the LLM. Traditionally, the problem with symbolic AI has been with creating the ontologies. You obviously can’t have a comprehensive ontology of the world because it’s inherently context dependent, and you have an infinite number of ways you can contextualize things. What neurosymbolics does is use LLMs for what they are good at, which is classifying noisy data from the outside world, and building a dynamic context. Once that’s done, it’s perfectly possible to use a logic engine to solve problems within that context.


Trump would be parading the pilot on TV like it was the second coming if they had him.


I long for the day when AI derangement finally ends


a weird thing to fixate on, but you do you I guess


If you’re claiming that any information in the video isn’t factual, feel free to say what it was.
I’m so sorry that you got your education at a clown school.
which makes it all the more weird that the idea hasn’t been more widely adopted