☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

  • 1.69K Posts
  • 1.58K Comments
Joined 6 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 18th, 2020

help-circle




















  • The talk is reality check for anyone who thinks open source is still in its honeymoon phase. He basically argues that we have been living through a Gilded Age of open source from about 2000 to 2020 where everything looked like rapid growth and success on the surface while the foundation was actually rotting. Just like the original Gilded Age had its robber barons and railroad monopolies he points out that we have traded genuine freedom for the convenience of proprietary platforms like GitHub and Slack. He is pretty blunt about the fact that the industry has shifted from community driven passion projects to venture capital backed rug pulls where companies like Redis or HashiCorp just swap licenses the moment they need to squeeze more profit out of users.

    He highlights how the XZ backdoor and the Log4Shell mess exposed that the entire internet is basically held together by three tired volunteers in a trench coat and how new regulations might actually make those people legally liable for bugs. He also goes off on how AI is being shoved into everything not because it helps developers but because VCs want to replace them, and he is clearly not a fan of how companies like Red Hat and Fedora are tying everything to AI tools now. It is a really sobering look at how we stopped caring about the principles of free software and just became pragmatic consumers who are okay with locked down ecosystems like macOS or Android as long as they are shiny.

    He thinks we can still fix this but it requires us to stop being spectators and actually start mentoring the next generation on why these values mattered in the first place. He basically says that if we just treat open source as a way to get free labor for corporations it is going to end up as a dead hobby like ham radio. The main takeaway is that the era of easy growth is over and if we actually want a future where we control our own computers we have to stop picking the convenient path and start fighting for the principled one again.










  • I think the reason they’re making noise is cause they want to make a case to ban Chinese models entirely. Right now they have a problem that Chinese models are open and anybody can download and run their own version. That directly undermines the whole business model of providing them as a service. I bet they’re going to try and argue that since DeepSeek and other Chinese companies stole their IP, these models are now illegal and can’t be used in the US.



  • For most use cases though, you don’t really have much of a benefit of running Linux over Android on a phone though. There’s enough Linux compatibility on Android already to make it work seamlessly with your Linux devices. In my opinion, as long as the stack is open source and well supported, it doesn’t really matter whether it’s Android or Linux based.



  • It would’ve been a cool world if we got Linux that could work seamlessly between desktop and mobile. Imagine if you had architecture where apps were built as services with an API, and then you could connect either desktop or mobile UI to them. Heck, at that point you could even make custom UIs across apps, or pipe them together the way you do with shell scripts. And then you could also have a device like a phone which has all your apps and data, and you could plug it into a dock with more memory, GPU, etc. So, you wouldn’t have to juggle a bunch of devices and sync data between them.





  • I just got a Pixel 9 last week and put GrapheneOS on it. Couldn’t be happier with it so far. The install was completely painless using web installer. All my apps worked out of the box. Google Store works fine in the sandbox. UX is good, and you don’t have any of the crap Google normally loads like all the adaptive services, and all the other junk that runs in the background.