Maybe software devs will have to go back to paying attention to memory usage

Oh, I’ll try it, thanks!

Yeah, thats useful too.

When doing science, reproducibility is a test that (in)validates hypothesis. If your software has a bug that creates a pattern in your analysis, we should hope that this bug does not happen in your collegues pc when they try to reproduce the analysis.

With only two states for each finger, you cant count past 1 in decimal. You can count up to 10 in unary.

Uhh, 100 uses 3 digits.

They must be aiming at being pathetic, theres no other explanation.

Thats a good insight, i think youre right. I felt that playing fallout new vegas

Isnt security mostly achieved by heavy obscurity? A password secures because other people dont know what it is, it is obscured.

It isnt optimized. Its gibberish written just to give some weight to the headline. People do bad jobs at science popularization too.

There are a bunch of things to research on fusion. Maybe they just thought this specific thing was out of reach, but were still trying to do other things.

Like the PvsNP computer science problem. Most computer scientists believe its impossible to make a polynomial algorithm that solves the traveling salesman problem, so most dont even try. But we dont know for certain that its actually impossible.

Having communication tools that avoid big tech is resistance. It doesnt require doomsday to be useful. Tech companies are luring people into giving away too much data by reducing our available options. Creating alternatives is resistance to that movement.

Just recently i was looking to buy a second hand fridge and realised that most people around here advertise those in facebook pages. I even tried to recreate an account after years of not going there. But it asked me to scan my face… just to create a fucking account to view those fridge posts… Since i dont want that, im locked out of that market…

Wont even take off

Everybody has issues they need to work on, if you can talk openly about those “red flagish” issues, maybe its not that hard to be around you…

I feel like instead of changing the name, we should stop justifying it on “equality”. The purpose of the movement is to stop a form of oppression. The name of the movement clearly takes the side of the oppressed, recognizing the oppression. Saying that the movement is for “equality” backpedals the recognition that an oppression exists and the discussion shifts to another point of derailment like “but arent men and women naturally different in some ways? is equality actually appropriate? what is equality?”

The productive feminist discussions are in debating the oppressions that exist and how to change them, not getting tangled in teological discussions about “nature” and “equality”.

I dont see how they were arguing for subdivisions. There are in fact many problems to solve, and we should unite to solve them. But if we are talking about a specific problem, we should use specific language. This shouldnt prevent us from seeing that there are common roots to all these problems.

It helps decide how much to actually save, and how much you can spend immediatly.

Even if you have savings its useful to do this sort of thing. It helps get a better idea of how much you can spend on these big thigs and still save money at the rate you want.

I remember lifting one of these bent pins with a kitchen knife feeling like i probably was making the problem worse… but it ended up working fine

Depends on the laws. In certain situations, you may be forced to sell part/all of you company.

Besides the legal ways, someone may threaten you or something demanding that you sell it, its not impossible.