Welp, you heard it here first, everyone: some rando on the Internet says without evidence that the chief of the IAEA is wrong, so there’s no 60% uranium (different from “weapons of mass destruction” on which the IAEA agrees with you, in case you didn’t read the article or even the headline).
This is all BS, there are no weapons of mass destruction.
Welp, you heard it here first, everyone: some rando on the Internet says without evidence that the chief of the IAEA is wrong, so there’s no 60% uranium (different from “weapons of mass destruction” on which the IAEA agrees with you, in case you didn’t read the article or even the headline).