• VitoRobles@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2時間前

    PRS claims “many game titles which incorporate PRS members’ musical works are made available on Steam,” including “high profile series” such as Forza Horizon, FIFA/EA FC, and GTA.

    This has “I’m throwing my lawsuit at everything and I hope it sticks” energy

    • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1時間前

      To me it looks like, “It’s cheaper to sue this company rather than the individual companies even though we know we don’t really have a leg to stand on”.

  • HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1時間前

    PRS claims “many game titles which incorporate PRS members’ musical works are made available on Steam,” including “high profile series” such as Forza Horizon, FIFA/EA FC, and GTA.

    So what is Rockstar, EA, etc doing producing games without a proper music license? Why is Valve being punished for selling something those game devs didn’t have rights to distribute?

    What about cinemas playing movie trailers that feature music? They need special permission beyond the licensing agreements already in place or something?

    How about the games sold on Amazon? Epic?

    Disband the clown show bringing this to court. Embarrassing.

  • shadowman98@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2時間前

    This doesn’t look meaningful at all. Why target valve and not the developers and publishers of these games? Were they not licensed appropriately such that they were compensated for their use? To my untrained eye this seems like they’re trying to double dip.

    • popcar2@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1時間前

      I did some research and apparently they’re sueing Valve because they think any platform where users can download something using their music should pay them, too. The publishers/devs are paying but Valve isn’t.

      No idea how well that holds up in court.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2時間前

      Valve profited, Valve is liable, Valve is a lot easier to get money out of than a bunch of indie studios that don’t exist any more.

      With great margins comes great responsibility.

      • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11分前

        No. The publishers and developers have already paid for the right to use the music.

        This is would be akin to having your local record store also pay a licensing fee to sell a CD or a movie store pay a license fee for selling a movie that has music in it.

        It’s a bullshit frivolous lawsuit.